ASPEK HUKUM PEMBUKTIAN DAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK DALAM ADMINISTRASI PUBLIK: ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PROSES ADMINISTRASI DAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20637118Keywords:
administrative evidence, reversed burden of proof, protection of rights, public administration, Administrative Court disputes, AUPB, good governance, enforcement of rulings, administrative measures, Indonesian OmbudsmanAbstract
Public administration in Indonesia faces a crucial challenge in maintaining a balance between the authority of civil servants and the protection of citizens’ rights through fair evidentiary mechanisms and effective dispute resolution, as stipulated in Law No. 5 of 1986 on Administrative Courts and Law No. 30 of 2014 on Government Administration. This article analyses the legal aspects of evidence under the principle of the reversed burden of proof, which requires civil servants to prove the validity of administrative acts through at least two valid forms of evidence (documents, witnesses, experts, admissions, and judicial knowledge), as well as the hierarchy of rights protection through preventive administrative measures, Ombudsman oversight, and remedial actions in the Administrative Court (PTUN) that guarantee the annulment of illegal decisions along with compensation for material and non-material damages. A normative legal approach using a statute approach and analysis of court rulings reveals key challenges such as unequal access to information, weak enforcement of rulings, and regulatory fragmentation that hinder good governance; consequently, recommendations include amending the Administrative Court Law to mandate digital evidence, strengthening enforcement sanctions, and digitising administrative processes to realise the rule of law and human rights-oriented bureaucratic accountability.
Downloads
References
Agustin, K. A., Firdaus, M. R., Ardani, A. H., & Asyifa, T. S. (2026). Analisis Yuridis atas Tenggang Waktu Gugatan dalam Perspektif Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan Substantif Putusan No. 250/G/2024/PTUN.JKT. Al-Zayn : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(1), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.61104/alz.v4i1.3002
Aji, A. yanasmoro, & Laba, I. N. (2019). KAJIAN HUKUM SISTEM PEMBUKTIAN DALAM PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA | WICAKSANA: Jurnal Lingkungan dan Pembangunan. https://ejurnal.warmadewa.ac.id/index.php/wicaksana/article/view/962
Amalia, R. A., Ashari, A., Kafrawi, R. M., & Setiawan, A. (2024). Problematika Kepatuhan Pejabat Tata Usaha Negara dalam Eksekusi Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Perspektif Hukum, 195–215. https://doi.org/10.30649/ph.v24i2.278
Amir, L. (2015). Pembuktian Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Tata USAha Negara Dan Perkara Pidana. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambi, 6(1), 43309.
Brown, I., & Marsden, C. T. (2023). Regulating Code: Good Governance and Better Regulation in the Information Age. MIT Press.
Chandra, F. (2024). Pengantar Hukum Acara PTUN. Meja Ilmiah Publikasi.
Christian, G. A., Fodhi, A. S., Lestari, E., Pangaribuan, N. N., & Ghustomi, M. I. (2026). Dinamika dan Problematika Sistem Pembuktian dalam Proses Hukum Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 2258–2263. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3759
Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.
Hiebl, M. R. W. (2023). Sample Selection in Systematic Literature Reviews of Management Research. Organizational Research Methods, 26(2), 229–261. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120986851
Junita, P., Hilal, C. A. N., & Kholila, M. A. (2026). Implikasi Yuridis Undang-Undang Administrasi Pemerintahan terhadap Kewenangan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business, 4(4), 2879–2887. https://doi.org/10.31004/riggs.v4i4.3922
Muksalmina, M., Thani, S., Yustisi, N., & Tasyukur, T. (2025). Reformasi Hukum Administrasi Negara dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance dan Kepastian Hukum di Indonesia. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 5(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.56128/jkih.v5i2.531
Piansah, A. (2024). The Role of Civil Law in Realizing Personal Data Security in the Era of Digital Transformation in Indonesia. Zona Law And Public Administration Indonesia, 2(4), 13–22.
Prayitno, M. P. R., Leonard, L. T., & Utama, K. W. (2023). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP UPAYA ADMINISTRATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA TATA USAHA NEGARA. Diponegoro Law Journal, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.14710/dlj.2023.37895
Rasji, R., Michellena, M., & Syamila, N. (2024). Optimalisasi Upaya Administratif Dalam Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 10(24), 457–468.
Rumadan, I. (2012). PROBLEMATIKA EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 1(3), 435–462. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.1.3.2012.435-462
Safitri, E. D., & Sa’adah, N. (2021). Penerapan Upaya Administratif Dalam Sengketa Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 3(1), 34–45. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i1.34-45
Sahputra, M., & Husniati. (2021). IMPLEMENTASI UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 30 TAHUN 2014 TENTANG ADMINISTRASI PEMERINTAHAN TERKAIT PEMBERANTASAN KORUPSI. Jurnal Transformasi Administrasi, 11(01), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.56196/jta.v11i01.181
Tamba, I. (2018). Peran Bpsk dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen di Indonesia untuk sebagai Wujud Cita-cita Perlindungan Konsumen di Bidang Ekonomi. Ensiklopedia of Journal, 1(1), 79–84.
Yuswarni, Y., Soedja, D., Balqis, S., & Arizal, A. (2024). Ombudsman Dalam Peningkatan Transparansi dan Akuntabilitas Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara AsIAN (Asosiasi Ilmuwan Administrasi Negara), 12(1), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.47828/jianaasian.v12i1.227
