ANALISIS PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM DAN KEBIJAKAN PENEGAKAN HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN YANG DIPICU OLEH KETIDAKSTABILAN EKONOMI: PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN RESTORATIF DALAM SISTEM HUKUM PIDANA INDONESIA

Authors

  • Muhammad Gazali Rahman IAIN Sultan Amai Gorontalo Author
  • Al-Amin Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Legal protection, restorative justice, law enforcement, theft, economic instability, Indonesian criminal law

Abstract

Economic instability is often a factor that triggers an increase in theft crimes, especially among economically disadvantaged communities who are driven by the need to survive. This phenomenon raises serious issues in Indonesia's criminal justice system, as it demonstrates the link between socio-economic conditions and criminal behaviour motivated by structural pressures. This study aims to analyse the forms of legal protection for perpetrators and victims of theft triggered by unstable economic conditions, as well as to examine ideal law enforcement policies based on the principles of restorative justice. Through a normative juridical approach supported by empirical data, this study examines relevant legislation, progressive legal theory, and the practice of implementing restorative justice in Indonesia. The results of the analysis show that current legal protection is still formalistic and does not fully consider the socio-economic background of perpetrators as part of substantive justice considerations. The retributive approach, which emphasises prison sentences, has limitations in terms of social recovery and recidivism prevention. In contrast, the restorative justice model provides a more humane alternative to resolving cases by focusing on the perpetrator's responsibility, compensation for the victim's losses, and social reconciliation. Criminal justice policies based on the restorative paradigm are believed to increase the effectiveness of law enforcement, strengthen public trust in law enforcement agencies, and broaden the meaning of justice for economically disadvantaged communities. This study concludes that the application of restorative justice in handling criminal acts of theft due to economic instability is an important step in reforming Indonesia's criminal justice system. This concept is in line with the values of Pancasila, the principles of humanity, and social justice, which are the foundations of the state. To be effective, its implementation needs to be accompanied by the development of law enforcement officials, regulatory reform, and increased public awareness of the importance of legal resolutions that are oriented towards restoration and social balance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Angel, C. M., & Ross, J. I. (2020). Restorative justice and the economic costs of crime: A critical analysis. Contemporary Justice Review, 23(3), 325–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/10282580.2020.1792392

Asshiddiqie, J. (2010). Konstitusi dan Konstitusionalisme Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.

Awaluddin, S. (2024). Keadilan Restoratif: Konsep dan Pengaturannya dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Amandemen, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.62383/amandemen.v1i1.822

Braithwaite, J. (1989). Crime, Shame and Reintegration. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809088

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195158397.001.0001

Burton, L. (2001). Restorative Justice: Philosophy and Implementation. Willan Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203468913

Byrne, P., & Marx, G. (2020). Restorative justice conferences, victim satisfaction and offender desistance: A systematic review. Criminology & Public Policy, 19(4), 1123–1151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9133.12535

Dignan, J. (2005). Understanding Victims and Restorative Justice. Open University Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-21475-4

Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.

Hadjon, P. M. (1987). Perlindungan Hukum bagi Rakyat di Indonesia. Bina Aksara.

Johnstone, G. (2013). Restorative Justice: Ideas, Values, Debates. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203077169

Laibahas, S. (2024). Tinjauan Kriminologi Terhadap Residivis Kasus Pencurian. Jurnal Hukum Dan Pemerintahan Ilmu Sosial, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3798

Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The effectiveness of restorative justice practices: A meta-analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969

Manan, B. (2008). Menegakkan Hukum di Indonesia. Gama Media.

McCold, P. (1999). Restorative justice: Thinking differently about crime. St. Louis University Public Law Review, 18(2), 303–326. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1835681

Moeljatno. (1987). Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Bina Aksara.

Peraturan Kapolri Nomor 8 Tahun 2021 tentang Penanganan Tindak Pidana Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif. (2021). Kementerian Dalam Negeri.

Rahardjo, S. (2006). Membedah Hukum Progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Rahardjo, S. (2009). Penegakan Hukum Progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Reksodiputro, M. (1994). Kriminologi: Suatu Pengantar. Liberty.

Rowe, F. (2024). Being systematic in literature reviews in IS. European Journal of Information Systems, 33(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2023.2281234

Saputra, D. N., Karomah, A., & Putri, F. E. (2024). Restorative Justice for Perpetrators of Theft Crimes Caused by Poverty. Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.37035/ajh.v20i1.10115

Shapland, J. (2008). Justice, Community and Civil Society. Willan Publishing.

Shapland, J., Atkinson, A., Colledge, E., Robinson, G., Sorsby, A., & Weaver, B. (2010). Does restorative justice reduce reoffending? Criminal Justice, 10(4), 505–520. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895810374733

Sherman, L. W., & Strang, H. (2007). Restorative justice: The evidence. The Smith Institute. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1302739

Sihombing, E. Y. (2015). Keadilan Restoratif dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Rajawali Pers.

Strang, H., Sherman, L. W., Woods, D. J., & Barnes, G. C. (2014). Cycles of decision making by police officers and counselors in incidents of domestic violence and child abuse. Journal of Police Science & Management, 16(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1350/pojm.2014.16.3.335

Vanfraechem, I., Aertsen, I., & Walgrave, L. (2011). Restorative justice: A European perspective. International Review of Victimology, 17(2), 125–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/026975801101700202

Welsh, B. C., & Rocque, M. (2012). When crime prevention harms: A review of systematic reviews. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 8(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-011-9140-2

Wilda. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian di Pengadilan Negeri Banda Aceh. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 5(1). https://doi.org/10.24815/jimhp.v5i1.35831

Yunus, M. (2019). Hukum Pidana dan Keadilan Restoratif. Pustaka Pelajar.

Zehr, H. (1990). Changing Lenses: A New Focus for Crime and Justice. Herald Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-10