Criminal Liability Of Perpetrators Who Promote Online Gambling Based On (A Study Of Decision Number 91/Pid.Sus/2024/Pn Lsm)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20553776Keywords:
Climate Change, Global Warming, Environmen-tal Law, Economic Ac-tivitiesAbstract
The development of information technology has driven the shift of crimes into cyberspace, including the increasingly widespread practice of online gambling. Promotion through social media by influencers has expanded pub-lic access to gambling activities and generated serious social and legal im-pacts. This study examines the regulation and criminal liability of perpetra-tors promoting online gambling in Indonesia through the analysis of the Lhokseumawe District Court Decision Number 91/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Lsm. The method employed is normative juridical research with statutory, concep-tual, and case study approaches. The results of the study indicate that the regulation of online gambling promotion is governed under Articles 303 and 303 bis of the Indonesian Criminal Code, Law Number 7 of 1974 concerning Gambling Control, and Article 27 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 45 paragraph (3) of the Electronic Information and Transactions Law as amended by Law Number 1 of 2024. Criminal liability is based on the ele-ments of conduct and fault (mens rea), whereby perpetrators may be regard-ed as participants or instigators. The court decision affirms that gambling-related content accessible to the public through social media fulfills the ele-ments of a criminal offense and may be subject to sanctions in accordance with applicable legal provisions.
Downloads
References
Abidin Farid, A. Z. (2014). Hukum Pidana I. Sinar Grafika.
Arief, B. N. (1996). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: PT. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Army, Eddy. (2020). Bukti Elektronik dalam Praktik Peradilan. Sinar Grafika.
Awaeh, S. H. (2017). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum atas Tindak Pidana Judi Online. Lex et Societatis, 5(5)., 123–133. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35796/les.v5i5.17708
Bahri, I. S. (2023). Cyber Crime dalam Sorotan Hukum Pidana. Bahasa Rakyat.
Chazawi, A., & Ferdian, A. (2011). Tindak pidana dan transaksi elektronik: Penyerangan ter-hadap kepentingan hukum pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan transaksi elektronik. Malang: Bayumedia Publishing.
Desriwaty, S. (2013). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Promosi Judi Online melalui Media Sosial. Prosiding/Artikel Hukum, Batam. Prosiding/Artikel Hukum, Batam.
Farid, & Hamzah, A. (2006). Bentuk-bentuk Khusus Perwujudan Delik (Percobaan, Penyertaan dan Gabungan Delik) dan Hukum Penitensier. Jakarta : Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fridiana, M. G., & Westra, I. K. (2021). Pengaturan Promosi Produk oleh Influencer di Media Sosial. Kertha Semaya, 9(12)., 2251–2261. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2021.v09.i12.p01
Gunawan, Muhammad Safaat, dkk. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Platform Media Sosial terhadap Promosi Judi Online. Jurnal Plaza Hukum Indonesia, 1(2)., 213–227. https://scholar.google.com/citations?view_op=view_citation&hl=id&user=iGBgqx8A AAAJ&citation_for_view=iGBgqx8AAAAJ:UeHWp8X0CEIC
Harahap, M. Yahya. (2018). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP (ed. terbaru).
Sinar Grafika.
Haryadi, Wahyu Tris. (2019). Penegakan Hukum Judi Online Berdasarkan Penerapan Kuhp Dan Undang Undang No. 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang No. 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi Dan Transaksi Elektronik. Jurnal Hukum Inrichting Recht Wahana Wacana Bidang Hukum, 13 (2). pp. 119-133.
Hiariej, E. O. S. (2024). Prinsip-Prinsip Hukum Pidana (ed. penyesuaian KUHP Nasional).
Rajawali Pers.
IALS (Mason, Stephen & Daniel Seng). (2021). Electronic Evidence (5th ed.). Institute of Advanced Legal Studies.
Jadidah, I. T., Lestari, U. M., Fatiha, K. A. S., Riyani, R., & Wulandari, C. A. (2023). Analisis Maraknya Judi Online di Masyarakat. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Budaya Indonesia, 1(1)., 20–27. https://doi.org/10.61476/8xvgdb22
Kartini, K. (2021). Patologi Sosial (Jilid 1). RajaGrafindo Persada.
Kristanto, K., & Rakhmat, B. (2025). Tindak Pidana Siber di Indonesia Regulasi, Tantangan, dan Penegakan Hukum.
Manaroinsong, F. G., Wahongan, A. S., & Kaligis, D. R. Y. J. (2024). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Promosi Judi Online. Lex Crimen, 12(4)., 1–17. https://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-b-d&q=Manaroinsong%2C+F.+G.%2C+Wahongan%2C+A.+S.%2C+%26+Kaligis%2C
+D.+R.+Y.+J.+%282024%29.+Pertanggungjawaban+Pidana+Pelaku+Promosi+Judi+ Online.+Jurnal+Fakultas+Hukum+UNSRAT%2C+12%284%29.
Mason, S., & Seng, D. (2023). Electronic Evidence (5th ed.). Institute of Advanced Legal Studies.
Moeljatno. (2002). Asas-asas Hukum Pidana. Rineka Cipta, Jakarta. Nassarudin, Ende Hasbi. (2016). Kriminologi. Pustaka Setia.
Pakpahan, Novritsar H., dkk. (2025). Penegakan Hukum Judi Online di Indonesia. Selat Media/Gramedia.
Permana, Y. H., & Utomo, H. K. (2023). Manajemen Forensik Digital.
Ramli, A. M. (2004). Cyber law & HAKI dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Refika Aditama. Ravena, D., & Kristian. (2017). Kebijakan Kriminal:[Criminal Policy]. Prenada Media.
Rizkita, A. F. (2023). Kebijakan Hukum tentang Perjudian Online. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Sosial, Dan Humaniora, 1(5)., 25–33. https://doi.org/10.572349/kultura.v1i5.480
Sirait, Timbo Mangaranap. (2020). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Korporasi dari Masa ke Masa.
Soerodibroto, R. S. (2006). KUHP dan KUHAP. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Undang-Undang No. 7 Tahun 1974 tentang Penertiban Perjudian, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1974 Nomor 54, Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 3040
Wahid, Abdul & Mohammad Labib. (2005). Kejahatan Mayantara (Cybercrime). Refika Aditama.
Waluyo, B. (2008). Pidana dan Pemidanaan. Sinar Grafika.
