THE RISK MANAGEMENT OF SCHOOL OPERATIONAL ASSISTANCE (BOS) FUNDS IN BONE BOLANGO REGENCY

Authors

  • Andriean Andjar Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author
  • Asna Aneta Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author
  • Ismet Sulila Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author
  • Yanti Aneta Universitas Negeri Gorontalo Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20553801

Keywords:

Risk Management, School Operational Assistance (BOS) Funds, Good Governance, ISO 31000, Public Administration

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the risk management of School Operational Assistance (BOS) funds in Bone Bolango Regency from the perspectives of public administration and good governance. The study was motivated by the persistence of various problems in the management of BOS funds, such as delays in fund disbursement, weak supervision, limited human resource capacity, and the suboptimal implementation of transparency and accountability in school financial administration. This study employed a qualitative approach with a descriptive method. Data collection techniques were conducted through observation, in-depth interviews, and documentation. Data analysis utilized an interactive model consisting of data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing. The findings reveal that risk management in the governance of BOS funds in Bone Bolango Regency has not yet operated optimally. Based on the Berg Risk Management Model approach, the identified risks include goal setting, risk identification, risk analysis, risk assessment, risk treatment selection, as well as monitoring and evaluation. The implementation of good governance principles such as transparency, accountability, effectiveness, and community participation still requires strengthening. This study recommends improving the capacity of BOS fund managers, strengthening internal supervision, digitalizing financial management systems, and enhancing coordination among educational stakeholders in order to establish effective and accountable governance of educational operational funding.

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aneta, Y., Aneta, A., Tohopi, R., Hulinggi, P. A., & Tee-Anastacio, P. A. D. (2025). Legal Philosophy’s Role in Human Rights and Fiscal Governance: Indonesia and the Philippines Comparative Insights. Jurnal Suara Hukum, 7(2), 437–462. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v7n2.p437-462

Denhardt, J. V., & Denhardt, R. B. 2003. The New Public Service: Serving, Not Steering. New York: M.E. Sharpe.

Dwiyanto, Agus. 2017. Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.

Hood, Christopher. 1991. “A Public Management for All Seasons?” Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

ISO 31000. 2018. Risk Management Guidelines. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.

Mahmudi. 2003. Manajemen Kinerja Sektor Publik. Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Miles, Matthew B., Huberman, A. Michael, & Saldaña, Johnny. 2014. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. California: Sage Publications.

Rahman, A. 2017. Administrasi Publik dan Implementasi Kebijakan. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sedarmayanti. 2020. Good Governance dan Good Corporate Governance. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

World Bank. 1992. Governance and Development. Washington DC: The World Bank.

Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, dan Teknologi Republik Indonesia Nomor 63 Tahun 2023 tentang Petunjuk Teknis Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Satuan Pendidikan.

Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Keban, Yeremias T. 2019. Enam Dimensi Strategis Administrasi Publik: Konsep, Teori, dan Isu. Yogyakarta: Gava Media.

Nugroho, Riant. 2018. Public Policy. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-05