MULTI-ETHNIC SOCIAL CAPITAL AND THE CONDITIONS FOR SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITY INNOVATION IN SEMI-URBAN LAMPUNG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20565839Keywords:
social capital, community-based social innovation, semi-urban development, multi-ethnic communities, community empowerment, IndonesiaAbstract
Community-based initiatives in developing country settings often fail not from a lack of initial participation, but from the absence of the institutional and social conditions needed to sustain what that participation created. The existing literature documents this difficulty consistently: more than seventy percent of such initiatives stagnate or regress within three to five years, particularly when external funding is reduced or removed (Dees et al., 2004; Moulaert et al., 2013). Pasar Yosomulyo Pelangi, known locally as Payungi, a community-run creative market in Kelurahan Yosomulyo, Kota Metro, Lampung, has operated outside this pattern since its founding in October 2018, maintaining viability across economic, social, institutional, and cultural dimensions without recurring external subsidy. This study draws on qualitative fieldwork conducted in Q3 2025 in Kelurahan Yosomulyo, involving in-depth interviews with 23 informants drawn from multiple participant categories, participant observation, and documentary analysis. The analysis reveals three interconnected mechanisms that explain Payungi's durability. First, its institutional design emerged from deliberate learning after an earlier initiative collapsed under administrative boundary conflicts. Second, contrary to the commonly assumed trade-off between bonding and bridging social capital in diverse communities, what the Payungi data shows is that strong bonding capital at the neighborhood level provided the stable foundation from which bridging capital across ethnic, gender, and disability lines could be deliberately constructed. Third, selective formalization, the practice of formalizing legally necessary functions while preserving participatory informality in governance decisions, allowed Payungi to navigate bureaucratic requirements without losing its grassroots character. These findings extend social capital theory for multi-ethnic semi-urban contexts in the Global South and offer practical lessons for community development practitioners.
Downloads
References
BPS Provinsi Lampung. (2024). Provinsi Lampung Dalam Angka 2024. Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Lampung.
Bradach, J. (2010). Scaling Impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 8(1), 40–46.
Cajaiba-Santana, G. (2014). Social Innovation: Moving the Field Forward. A Conceptual Framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2004). Strategic Tools for Social Entrepreneurs: Enhancing the Performance of Your Enterprising Nonprofit. Wiley.
Dinas Pariwisata dan Ekonomi Kreatif Provinsi Lampung. (2024). Pasar Yosomulyo Pelangi (Payungi). https://disparekraf.lampungprov.go.id/detail-post/pasar-yosomulyo-pelangi-payungi
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380. https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
McGee, T. G. (1991). The Emergence of Desakota Regions in Asia: Expanding a Hypothesis. In N. Ginsburg, B. Koppel, & T. G. McGee (Eds.), The Extended Metropolis: Settlement Transition in Asia (pp. 3–26). University of Hawaii Press.
Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A., & Hamdouch, A. (2013). The International Handbook on Social Innovation. Edward Elgar.
Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The Open Book of Social Innovation. NESTA and The Young Foundation.
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press.
Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding Institutional Diversity. Princeton University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster.
Putnam, R. D. (2007). E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-First Century. Scandinavian Political Studies, 30(2), 137–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
Rigg, J. (1998). Rural-Urban Interactions, Agriculture and Wealth: A Southeast Asian Perspective. Progress in Human Geography, 22(4), 497–522. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913298666847492
Tacoli, C. (1998). Rural-Urban Interactions: A Guide to the Literature. Environment and Urbanization, 10(1), 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624789801000105
Tacoli, C. (2003). The Links Between Urban and Rural Development. Environment and Urbanization, 15(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/095624780301500102
Tracey, P., & Stott, N. (2017). Social Innovation: A Window on Alternative Ways of Organizing and Innovating. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 19(1), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1268924
Warganegara, A., & Waley, P. (2022). The Political Legacies of Transmigration and the Dynamics of Ethnic Politics: A Case Study from Lampung, Indonesia. Asian Ethnicity, 23(4), 676–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2021.1889356
Westley, F., & Antadze, N. (2010). Making a Difference: Strategies for Scaling Social Innovation for Greater Impact. The Innovation Journal, 15(2), 1–19.
Woolcock, M. (2001). The Place of Social Capital in Understanding Social and Economic Outcomes. ISUMA: Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 2(1), 11–17.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
