EFFECTIVENESS OF AUGMENTED REALITY TECHNOLOGY IN STRENGTHENING SCIENCE CONCEPTUAL LEARNING AT THE PRIMARY SCHOOL LEVEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21713258Keywords:
augmented reality, conceptual understanding, primary education, science learning, interactive learning media, systematic literature reviewAbstract
This study examines the effectiveness of Augmented Reality (AR) technology in strengthening science conceptual learning at the primary school level through a systematic literature review. The review synthesizes recent studies published between 2021 and 2026 and indexed in major academic databases, including Scopus, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, ERIC, and Google Scholar. Relevant articles were selected based on criteria related to the use of AR in primary science education, conceptual understanding, learning outcomes, engagement, and science process skills. The findings indicate that AR contributes positively to students’ understanding of abstract, microscopic, spatial, and dynamic science concepts by integrating three-dimensional visualization, real-world contexts, and interactive learning experiences. AR is particularly effective when combined with inquiry-based learning, flipped classroom strategies, collaborative activities, guided questioning, and teacher facilitation. In addition to conceptual understanding, AR supports motivation, curiosity, spatial ability, higher-order thinking, and active participation. However, its effectiveness is influenced by instructional design quality, content relevance, cognitive load, teacher competence, device availability, technical support, and school infrastructure. Poorly designed AR applications may distract students or increase cognitive overload without improving learning meaningfully. The study concludes that AR should be positioned as a pedagogical tool embedded within structured science instruction rather than as a standalone technological innovation. Future research should examine long-term concept retention, misconception reduction, transfer of learning, cost-effectiveness, inclusive access, and implementation across diverse primary school contexts. These findings provide practical implications for teachers, schools, developers, and policymakers seeking to integrate AR into science education effectively in equitable, sustainable, and developmentally appropriate ways.
Downloads
References
Al-Awidi, H., Abumosa, M., & Al-Mughrabi, A. (2025). The effect of mobile image recognition-based augmented reality application on students’ acquisition of science processing skills and motivations to learn science. Interactive Learning Environments, 33(2), 1238–1249. doi:10.1080/10494820.2024.2367020
Arici, F. (2024). Investigating the effectiveness of augmented reality technology in science education in terms of environmental literacy, self-regulation, and motivation to learn science. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 40(24), 8476–8496. doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2310921
Botkin, M. D., & Trespalacios, J. H. (2026). Identifying virtual/augmented reality research in K–12 science education: A scoping study. TechTrends, 70, 138–149. doi:10.1007/s11528-025-01138-1
Câmara Olim, S., Nisi, V., & Romão, T. (2024). Augmented reality interactive experiences for multi-level chemistry understanding. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 42, Article 100681. doi:10.1016/j.ijcci.2024.100681
Chang, H.-Y., Binali, T., Liang, J.-C., Chiou, G.-L., Cheng, K.-H., Lee, S. W.-Y., & Tsai, C.-C. (2022). Ten years of augmented reality in education: A meta-analysis of (quasi-)experimental studies to investigate the impact. Computers & Education, 191, Article 104641. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104641
Fearn, W., & Hook, J. (2023). A service design thinking approach: What are the barriers and opportunities of using augmented reality for primary science education? Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(1), 329–351. doi:10.3926/jotse.1394
Geng, G., Green, K., Telford, A., & Zhu, Y. (2026). Engaging young minds: How smart augmented reality glasses transform learning experiences in AR smart glasses immersive virtual learning environments. Journal of Science Education and Technology. Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10956-026-10299-4
Lu, Z., Chiu, M. M., Wang, S., Mao, W., & Lei, H. (2025). Effects of augmented reality on students’ higher-order thinking: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 63(3), 728–747. doi:10.1177/07356331241309644
Mansour, N., Aras, C., Kleine Staarman, J., & Alotaibi, S. B. M. (2025). Embodied learning of science concepts through augmented reality technology. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 8245–8275. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-13120-0
Nikou, S. A. (2024). Factors influencing student teachers’ intention to use mobile augmented reality in primary science teaching. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 15353–15374. doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12481-w
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71
Paul, J., Lim, W. M., O’Cass, A., Hao, A. W., & Bresciani, S. (2021). Scientific procedures and rationales for systematic literature reviews: SPAR-4-SLR. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 45(4), O1–O16. doi:10.1111/ijcs.12695
Prasetya, F., Fortuna, A., Samala, A. D., Rawas, S., Mystakidis, S., Syahril, S., Waskito, W., Primawati, P., Wulansari, R. E., & Kassymova, G. K. (2024). The impact of augmented reality learning experiences based on the motivational design model: A meta-analysis. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 10, Article 100926. doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.100926
Tiep, P. Q., & Huong, N. T. (2025). Building a flipped classroom model combined with augmented reality to improve the effectiveness of teaching natural and social sciences in primary schools. Educational Process: International Journal, 18, Article e2025445. doi:10.22521/edupij.2025.18.445
Wen, Y., Wu, L., He, S., Ng, N. H.-E., Teo, B. C., Looi, C. K., & Cai, Y. (2023). Integrating augmented reality into inquiry-based learning approach in primary science classrooms. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(4), 1631–1651. doi:10.1007/s11423-023-10235-y
Xu, W.-W., Su, C.-Y., Hu, Y., & Chen, C.-H. (2022). Exploring the effectiveness and moderators of augmented reality on science learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 31(5), 621–637. doi:10.1007/s10956-022-09982-z
Zhang, J., Li, G., Huang, Q., Feng, Q., & Luo, H. (2022). Augmented reality in K–12 education: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature from 2000 to 2020. Sustainability, 14(15), Article 9725. doi:10.3390/su14159725
Zhang, S., & Yao, Z. (2025). The challenge of the application of augmented reality in science education in China: A systematic review. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 7, Article 4. doi:10.1186/s43031-025-00123-1
