CROSS-SECTORAL GOVERNANCE AND ECONOMIC LAW: STRENGTHENING NATIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND EQUITABLE WELFARE

Authors

  • Sapta Nur Fallah Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Author
  • Frida Nurrahma Masturi Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Author
  • Ady Setyo Nugroho Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21713276

Keywords:

cross-sectoral governance, economic law, national development, equitable welfare, regulatory integration, banking sector, mining governance, service sector

Abstract

This study examines the role of cross-sectoral governance and economic law in strengthening national development and equitable welfare by integrating the banking, mining, and services sectors. Using a qualitative library research design, the study reviews recent peer-reviewed literature published between 2021 and 2026 from reputable academic databases, including Scopus, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, Emerald Insight, and Taylor & Francis. The selected studies were analyzed using content analysis and thematic synthesis to identify patterns in regulatory coherence, institutional coordination, financial inclusion, mining governance, service accessibility, public accountability, and distributive justice. The findings show that fragmented sectoral regulations often lead to overlapping authority, policy inconsistency, weak implementation, environmental and social risks, and an unequal distribution of economic benefits. Banking regulation supports development when financial stability is combined with inclusive and responsible financing. Mining governance contributes to welfare when resource exploitation is linked to environmental protection, community participation, local development, and transparent benefit sharing. The service sector serves as the primary channel through which economic gains are translated into public services, employment opportunities, infrastructure, and regional development. The study proposes an integrated cross-sectoral economic governance framework consisting of regulatory coherence, interinstitutional coordination, responsible resource allocation, inclusive service delivery, and distributive accountability. It concludes that economic law should serve as a meta-governance mechanism to align sectoral policies with shared development goals. National development should therefore be evaluated not only through economic growth, investment, and production, but also through social inclusion, environmental sustainability, regional equality, service accessibility, and the fair distribution of development opportunities across society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bibi, S., Zada, H., Awan, T., Wong, W.-K., & Khan, N. (2024). Evaluating the moderating role of governance on the relationships between social inclusion, ICT infrastructure, and financial inclusion. Heliyon, 10(13), Article e33711. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33711.

Domínguez-Gómez, J. A., & González-Gómez, T. (2021). Governance in mining: Management, ethics, sustainability, and efficiency. The Extractive Industries and Society, 8(3), Article 100910. DOI: 10.1016/j.exis.2021.100910.

Hilmawan, R., Aprianti, Y., Yudaruddin, R., Bintoro, R. F. A., Suharsono, F., & Wahyuningsih, N. (2023). Public sector innovation in local government and its impact on development outcomes: Empirical evidence in Indonesia. Heliyon, 9(12), Article e22833. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e22833.

Kim, K., & Sumner, A. (2021). Bringing state-owned entities back into the industrial policy debate: The case of Indonesia. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 59, 496–509. DOI: 10.1016/j.strueco.2021.10.002.

Lee, S., & Kim, M. (2024). Public perceptions of cross-sector collaboration and sector bias: Evidence from a survey experiment. Public Management Review, 26(8), 2429–2451. DOI: 10.1080/14719037.2023.2273316.

Mishra, B., & Kumar, A. (2023). How does the regulatory framework impact sectoral performance? A systematic literature review. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(5), 1419–1444. DOI: 10.1108/IJPPM-07-2021-0398.

Ofori-Okyere, I., Edghiem, F., & Kumah, S. P. (2023). Marketing inclusive banking services to financially vulnerable consumers: A service design approach. Journal of Services Marketing, 37(2), 232–247. DOI: 10.1108/JSM-10-2021-0399.

Olvik, J. (2024). Navigating complexity: Potentials and paradoxes within governance strategies for public and third sector collaboration. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 35(6), 1154–1166. DOI: 10.1007/s11266-024-00682-3.

Suopajärvi, L., Beland Lindahl, K., Eerola, T., & Poelzer, G. (2023). Social aspects of business risk in the mineral industry—Political, reputational, and local acceptability risks facing mineral exploration and mining. Mineral Economics, 36, 321–331. DOI: 10.1007/s13563-022-00345-z.

Werner, T. T., Toumbourou, T., Maus, V., Lukas, M. C., Sonter, L. J., Muhdar, M., Runting, R. K., & Bebbington, A. (2024). Patterns of infringement, risk, and impact driven by coal mining permits in Indonesia. Ambio, 53(2), 242–256. DOI: 10.1007/s13280-023-01944-y.

Xi, W., & Wang, Y. (2023). Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth. Heliyon, 9(9), Article e19731. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19731.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-30