PUBLIC POLICY AND BUREAUCRATIC REFORM IN STRENGTHENING NATIONAL FOOD SECURITY

Authors

  • Rita Hayati Universitas Muhammdiyah Bengkulu Author
  • Al-Amin Halal Tourism Marketing, Department of Islamic Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia, Department of Islamic Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sjech M.Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21715286

Keywords:

bureaucratic reform, collaborative governance, food governance, food security, Public Policy, Indonesia

Abstract

This study examines the relationship between public policy and bureaucratic reform in strengthening national food security in Indonesia. The research employs a library-based systematic literature review, analyzing recent scholarly publications on food policy, food governance, decentralization, institutional reform, intergovernmental coordination, and collaborative governance. The findings indicate that national food security is determined not only by food production and availability but also by accessibility, distribution stability, nutritional quality, environmental sustainability, institutional capacity, and public participation. The study identifies several major obstacles, including fragmented authority, sectoral ego, overlapping programs, weak coordination between central and local governments, unequal bureaucratic capacity across regions, limited data integration, and insufficient accountability mechanisms. These problems reduce the effectiveness of policy implementation and weaken the government’s ability to respond to food crises, price volatility, supply chain disruption, and climate-related risks. The discussion shows that bureaucratic reform must move beyond structural simplification and administrative efficiency toward results-oriented, data-driven, adaptive, and collaborative governance. Strengthening food security, therefore, requires clearer institutional mandates, integrated information systems, improved civil servants' competence, stronger monitoring and evaluation, transparent budgeting, and meaningful participation from farmers, businesses, universities, civil society, and local communities. The study concludes that integrated public policy and comprehensive bureaucratic reform are essential to transforming Indonesia’s food governance from a fragmented, reactive system into one that is coordinated, inclusive, resilient, and sustainable. This transformation is expected to improve policy effectiveness, reduce regional disparities, and support long-term national food security amid increasingly complex domestic and global food challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, A., Darma, R., Irawan, A., Fudjaja, L., Amandaria, R., & Akzar, R. (2025). An institutional framework for enhanced food security amidst the COVID-19 pandemic: Strategic implementation and outcomes. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 21, Article 101833. DOI: 10.1016/j.jafr.2025.101833

Amin, F., Poespito Hadi, W., Zauhar, S., & Santoso Haryono, B. (2022). Determinants of post-COVID-19 food security policy success. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment, 13(4), 440–450. DOI: 10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2020-0118

Astuti, S. J. W., Panglipursari, D. L., Murdani, M. H., Diyanto, A. K., & Putra, B. T. (2026). Collaborative governance for food security policy in Indonesia: Lessons for achieving the SDGs in Asia-Pacific. Development Studies Research, 13(1), Article 2674596. DOI: 10.1080/21665095.2026.2674596

Barinda, S., & Ayuningtyas, D. (2022). Assessing the food control system in Indonesia: A conceptual framework. Food Control, 134, Article 108687. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108687

Clapp, J., Moseley, W. G., Burlingame, B., & Termine, P. (2022). Viewpoint: The case for a six-dimensional food security framework. Food Policy, 106, Article 102164. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2021.102164

Nagel, B., Anggraini, E., Buhari, N., Gray, S., Partelow, S., & Schlüter, A. (2024). Mental models of aquaculture governance in Indonesia. Sustainability Science, 19(6), 1825–1845. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-024-01545-y

Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., . . . Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.n71

Susanty, A., Susanto, N., Denny, H., Prabowo, Y., Permadi, R. A. S., & Fauziyah, A. (2022). Designing interventions to mitigate coordination barriers in handling food security: Insights from Central Java Province. Journal of Food Quality, 2022, Article 6843474. DOI: 10.1155/2022/6843474

Syahirul Alam, M. D. S. A., Rhama, B., Setiawan, F., Utami Irwan, A. I., & Selvia, F. (2024). The Indonesian food security policy: Mapping of traditional markets in Central Kalimantan. Policy & Governance Review, 8(2), 212–226. DOI: 10.30589/pgr.v8i2.906

Downloads

Published

2026-07-31