BROKERAGE, ETHNICITY, AND THE LEGACY OF TRANSMIGRATION IN LAMPUNG TIMUR REGIONAL HEAD ELECTIONS: A SCOPING REVIEW OF THE INDONESIAN LITERATURE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22004091Keywords:
ethnic identity politics, political brokerage, clientelism, transmigration policy, regional head elections, Lampung, scoping review, PRISMA-ScRAbstract
Background: Indonesia's transition to direct regional head elections (Pilkada) since 2005 reopened local political contestation to ethnic and religious mobilisation. Lampung province presents a distinctive case because its demographic composition was reshaped by a century of state-sponsored transmigration, yet no review has systematically mapped how the literature connects ethnic identity politics, social network/brokerage mechanisms, and the legacy of transmigration policy within a single analytical frame at the district (kabupaten) level. Objective: This scoping review maps and synthesises the Indonesian and international literature (2010–2026) addressing three interlocking constructs – ethnic identity politics, political brokerage/social networks, and transmigration policy – as they bear on regional head elections in Indonesia, with particular attention to Lampung. Methods: Following the Arksey and O’Malley scoping review framework and adapted PRISMA-ScR reporting guidance, the review question was structured using the SPIDER framework (Sample, Phenomenon of Interest, Design, Evaluation, Research type). Systematic searches were conducted across academic search engines, including a dedicated update search of Semantic Scholar, CrossRef, and Google Scholar, totalling 23 search/retrieval actions and 135 raw records. After deduplication (n = 56 unique records) and eligibility screening against inclusion criteria (2010–2026 or foundational status, Indonesian/English language, SINTA/Scopus-indexed journals or academic books, thematic relevance), 20 sources were included. Data were extracted into a structured matrix and appraised using an adapted Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist for qualitative designs, supplemented by a relevance-and-currency assessment for non-qualitative sources. Results: Included sources cluster into three thematic strands: (1) ethnic outbidding and constructivist critiques of ethnic identity in Indonesian elections; (2) clientelism, brokerage, and social network mechanisms underpinning vote mobilisation; and (3) the demographic and political legacy of transmigration, particularly in Lampung, where ethnicity and religion converge through what recent scholarship terms “ethnicity and religion based organizations” (ERBOs). Eight of nine qualitative-design sources received a “high” CASP-adapted quality rating, indicating a methodologically robust evidentiary base. Conclusion: While each thematic strand is individually well developed, no identified study integrates ethnic identity, brokerage networks, and transmigration legacy within a single district-level, two-cycle comparative design. This gap substantiates the need for original qualitative-comparative research of the kind undertaken on Lampung Timur's 2020 and 2024 Pilkada.
Downloads
References
Aspinall, E. (2011). Democratization and ethnic politics in Indonesia: Nine theses. Journal of East Asian Studies, 11(2), 289–319. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1598240800007190
Aspinall, E. (2013). A nation in fragments: Patronage and neoliberalism in contemporary Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 45(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2013.758820
Aspinall, E. (2014). When brokers betray: Clientelism, social networks, and electoral politics in Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies, 46(4), 545–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2014.960706
Aspinall, E., & As’ad, M. U. (2015). The patronage patchwork: Village brokerage networks and the power of the state in an Indonesian election. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 171(2/3), 165–195. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-17102004
Aspinall, E., & Berenschot, W. (2019). Democracy for sale: Elections, clientelism, and the state in Indonesia. Cornell University Press.
Aspinall, E., & Mietzner, M. (2019). Indonesia’s democratic paradox: Competitive elections amidst rising illiberalism. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 55(3), 295–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074918.2019.1690412
Aspinall, E., & Rohman, N. (2017). Village head elections in Java: Money politics and brokerage in the remaking of Indonesia’s rural elite. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 48(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463416000461
Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (Eds.). (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. NUS Press.
Berenschot, W. (2018). The political economy of clientelism: A comparative study of Indonesia’s patronage democracy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(12), 1563–1593.
Chandra, K. (2005). Ethnic parties and democratic stability. Perspectives on Politics, 3(2), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592705050188
Haridison, A. (2026). Clientelism and ethnic brokerage in outer island Indonesia. Critical Asian Studies. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14672715.2026.2684602
Horowitz, D. L. (1985). Ethnic groups in conflict. University of California Press.
Indrajat, H., & Budiono, P. (2026). Transformasi identitas etnis Jawa dalam dua konteks migrasi: Sintesis sistematis komparatif transmigrasi Indonesia dan diaspora Malaysia. Journal of Government and Social Issues (JGSI), 5(2), 70–83. https://doi.org/10.23960/jgsi.v5i2.98
Lestari, D. (2019). Pilkada DKI Jakarta 2017: Dinamika politik identitas di Indonesia. JUPE: Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 4(4), 12–16.
Pratiwi, A., Matous, P., & Martinus, K. (2022). Transmigration programs and migrant positions in rural community knowledge networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 95, 391–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.09.019
Rabushka, A., & Shepsle, K. A. (1972). Politics in plural societies: A theory of democratic instability. Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.
Susetyo, H., Febriyanto, S., Latifah, T. T., Ardiansyah, D., Angelina, F., Hamadi, I. G., Haq, N. I., & Fatih, N. (2024). Kebijakan transmigrasi dalam kerangka kesejahteraan sosial dan ketahanan nasional di Provinsi Lampung. Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 25(2), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.7454/jurnalkessos.v25i2.1034
Warburton, E., & Aspinall, E. (2019). Explaining Indonesia’s democratic regression: Structure, agency and popular opinion. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 41(2), 255–285. https://doi.org/10.1355/cs41-2k
Warganegara, A., & Waley, P. (2022). The political legacies of transmigration and the dynamics of ethnic politics: A case study from Lampung, Indonesia. Asian Ethnicity, 23(4), 676–696. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2021.1889356
Warganegara, A., & Waley, P. (2024). Do ethnic politics matter? Reassessing the role of ethnicity in local elections in Indonesia. South East Asia Research, 32(3), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/0967828X.2024.2406791
