DEGREE OF PUBLICNESS AS ACCESSIBILITY IN INDEPENDENT LIBRARY (CASE STUDY: FOREWORD LIBRARY, SOUTH JAKARTA)

Authors

  • Nur Afifa Prasanti Telkom University Author
  • Ully Irma Maulina Hanafiah Telkom University Author
  • Agustinus Nur Arief Hapsoro Telkom University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21881410

Keywords:

accessibility, degree of publicness, independent library, third place

Abstract

Independent libraries have increasingly evolved into third places that accommodate literacy, social interaction, and community activities. This transformation raises questions regarding how public accessibility is maintained within privately managed library spaces. This study aims to examine the accessibility level of Foreword Library, South Jakarta, through an evaluation of its degree of publicness. A mixed-method case study approach was employed by combining field observations during normal operational conditions and semi-structured interviews with library users and management. The collected data were assessed using an integrated publicness evaluation framework consisting of the Publicness Evaluation Model for Libraries (PEML), the Star Model of Publicness, and the Six-Axial Model. The evaluation focused on three dimensions, namely design, management, and use, represented through indicators related to accessibility, physical configuration, management practices, user diversity, and activity patterns. The findings demonstrate that the degree of publicness provides a measurable representation of library accessibility. Foreword Library exhibits a relatively high level of accessibility during normal operations, although several indicators, particularly those associated with physical access and management, remain influenced by its status as an independently managed private library. These results indicate that evaluating the degree of publicness offers an effective framework for understanding accessibility in independent libraries functioning as contemporary third places.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aabø, S., & Audunson, R. (2012). Use of library space and the library as place. Library and Information Science Research, 34(2), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lisr.2011.06.002

Athallah, R. (2026, May 22). Kenapa Banyak Anak Muda Indonesia Mulai Mendirikan Perpustakaan Sendiri? ABC News

Creswell, J. W. (2021). A concise introduction to mixed methods research. SAGE publications

Di Marino, M., Hewidy, H., Mady, C., Högström, E., & Berger, L. (2025). The hybridisation of public libraries: a comparative study between Helsinki, Oslo and Stockholm. International Journal of Cultural Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2025.2533327

Elmborg, J. K. (2011). Libraries as the spaces between us: Recognizing and valuing the third space. Reference and User Services Quarterly, 50(4), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.5860/rusq.50n4.338

Esquivel Carreón, G., & Marzal García-Quismondo, M. Á. (2026). Proposal for a publicness evaluation model for libraries. IFLA Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352261436726

Fatmawati, E., Udasmoro, W., & Noviani, R. (2018). Functional shift of library: The third space; production. Digital Press Social Sciences and Humanities, 1, 00003. https://doi.org/10.29037/digitalpress.41237

Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G., & Casey, M. F. (2009). The impact of third places on community quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(4), 333–345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-009-9084-8

Kerrigan, C. E. (2020). The more things change: The role of the independent library in the 21st century [Dissertation]. University of South Australia.

Kuno, K. (2011). School Libraries as the “Third Place” (Vol. 11). http://hdl.handle.net/2433/152088

Lin, H., Pang, N., & Luyt, B. (2015). Is the library a third place for young people? Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 47(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1177/0961000614532303

Littman, D. M. (2021). Third place theory and social work: Considering collapsed places. Journal of Social Work, 21(5), 1225–1242. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017320949445

Mantey, D. (2017). The ‘publicness’ of suburban gathering places: The example of Podkowa Leśna (Warsaw urban region, Poland). Cities, 60, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2016.07.002

Nadizti, F., & Hanan, H. (2022). Metodologi Penelitian Derajat Kepublikan Ruang Terbuka Publik Perkotaan. Archvisual: Jurnal Arsitektur Dan Perencanaan

Oldenburg, R. (1999). The Great Good Place: Cafés, coffee shops, bookstores, bars, hair salons, and other hangouts at the heart of a community. Berkshire. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.9561417

Varna, G. (2018). MEASURING PUBLIC SPACE : the star model. ROUTLEDGE

Varna, G., & Tiesdell, S. (2010). Assessing the publicness of public space: The Star Model of publicness. Journal of Urban Design, 15(4), 575–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2010.502350

Yin, R. K. ., & Campbell, D. T. . (2018). Case study research and applications : design and methods. SAGE Publications, Inc

Downloads

Published

2026-08-10