PROJECT SCHEDULING EVALUATION USING THE PERT (PROGRAM EVALUATION AND REVIEW TECHNIQUE) METHOD FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF THE BUARENO – KEDUNGREJO ROAD IN BOJONEGORO

Authors

  • Slamet Widodo Department of CIvil Engineering, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya Indonesia Author
  • Hanie Teki Tjendani Department of CIvil Engineering, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya Indonesia Author
  • Erni Puspanantasari Putri Department of CIvil Engineering, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya Indonesia Author

Keywords:

PERT, Project Scheduling, Time Uncertainty, Probability, Road Construction

Abstract

The Program Evaluation and Review Technique (PERT) method is one of the project scheduling techniques designed to address the uncertainty of activity durations. In this study, PERT is used to analyze the probability of completing the reconstruction project of Jalan Baureno – Kadungrejo, Bojonegoro, which has experienced significant delays from the original schedule. PERT allows for the estimation of project completion time based on three main parameters: optimistic time, most likely time, and pessimistic time. Through this probabilistic approach, the estimated project completion time (expected time), standard deviation, and variance of the project's critical path are calculated. The analysis results show that the use of the PERT method provides important information regarding the possibility of project completion within a certain timeframe and helps in formulating strategies to mitigate the risk of delays. In addition, this method has also proven effective in rescheduling the project based on the level of confidence in its successful completion. The application of PERT in this research provides a realistic picture of the management of complex and dynamic project timelines, and supports more measurable managerial decision-making in construction projects.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Artigues, C. (2025). Fifty years of research on resource-constrained project scheduling explored from different perspectives. European Journal of Operational Research, December 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2025.03.024

Bergantiños, G., Valencia-toledo, A., & Vidal-puga, J. (2018). Hart and Mas-Colell consistency in PERT problems ✩. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 243, 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dam.2017.08.012

Carlos, J., García, F., Hernández, G., Soraya, J., & Cuesta, R. (2023). Heliyon Uncertain project network analysis with fuzzy – PERT and Interval Type – 2 fuzzy activity durations. Heliyon, 9(4), e14833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14833

Chang, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhang, C., Xue, A., Chen, B., Zhang, W., Xu, L., Liu, X., & Dai, Y. (2021). Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering PERT based emergency disposal technique for fracture failure of deepwater drilling riser. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 201(January), 108407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108407

Eddine, N., Benhocine, A., & Belouadah, H. (2011). A new method for constructing a minimal PERT network. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 35(9), 4575–4588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2011.03.031

García, B., Soto, D., Rosarius, A., Rieger, J., Chen, Q., & Adey, B. T. (2017). Using a Tabu-search Algorithm and 4D Models to Improve Construction Project Schedules. Procedia Engineering, 196(June), 698–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.07.236

Grace, R., & German, J. D. (2024). ^ ĐŝĞŶĐĞ ŝƌĞĐƚ ^ ĐŝĞŶĐĞ ŝƌĞĐƚ Optimizing Optimizing Project Project Scheduling Scheduling Using Using Linear Linear Programming Programming Approach : Approach : A A Case Case Study Study of of Heating Heating Ventilation Ventilation & & Air Air Conditioning Conditioning Mechanical Mechanical Installation Installation. Procedia Computer Science, 234, 683–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2024.03.054

Hashemin, S. S., Ghomi, S. M. T. F., & Modarres, M. (2012). Sharif University of Technology Optimal constrained non-renewable resource allocation in PERT networks with discrete activity times. Scientia Iranica, 19(3), 841–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.02.024

Kokuryo, D., Nagata, D., Kaihara, T., Umeda, T., & Mizuhara, H. (2024). ScienceDirect A Proposal of Dual Resource Constraint Job-shop Scheduling Method combined with Discrete PSO and Stochastic PERT considering Processing Time Uncertainty. Procedia CIRP, 130, 1462–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2024.10.267

Lee, A. H. I., Kang, H., & Huang, T. (2017). Project management model for constructing a renewable energy plant. Procedia Engineering, 174, 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.01.186

Mazlum, M., Fuat, A., & Güner, İ. (2015). CPM , PERT and Project Management With Fuzzy Logic Technique and Implementation On A Business. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 210, 348–357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.378

Mishakova, A., Vakhrushkina, A., Murgul, V., & Sazonova, T. (2016). Project control based on a mutual application of pert and earned value management methods. Procedia Engineering, 165, 1812–1817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.927

Moreno, F., Forcael, E., Orozco, F., & Baesler, F. (2025). Heliyon Fixed start method for repetitive project scheduling with simulated annealing. Heliyon, 11(2), e41741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2025.e41741

Moreno, F., Orozco, F., & Rojas, O. (2020). A Fixed Start Scheduling Approach for Repetitive Construction Projects. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 24(6), 1671–1682. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1429-8

Pregina, K. (2024). Fuzzy-Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique for Scheduling Construction Projects. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(7), 2573–2587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-024-0904-z

Ren, Y., & Li, J. (2023). ScienceDirect ScienceDirect Research on Software Project Schedule Planning Technology on Software Project Schedule Planning Technology Based on the Integration of PERT and CPM Based on the Integration of PERT and CPM. Procedia Computer Science, 228, 253–261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2023.11.029

Sackey, S., & Kim, B. (2019). Schedule Risk Analysis using a Proposed Modified Variance and Mean of the Original Program Evaluation and Review Technique Model. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 23(4), 1484–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-019-1826-z

Wenying, L., & Xiaojun, L. (2011). Progress Risk Assessment for Spliced Network of Engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia, 1, 271–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sepro.2011.08.042

Downloads

Published

2025-06-15

Issue

Section

Articles