DEVELOPMENT OF A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR SUPPLIER SELECTION USING AHP-TOPSIS INTEGRATED MODEL
Keywords:
Decision support system, supplier selection, ahp, topsis, multi-criteria decision making, supply chain managementAbstract
The selection of suppliers is a critical strategic decision in supply chain management that directly influences organizational efficiency and competitiveness. In recent years, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods have been extensively employed to support this complex decision-making process. This literature-based study aims to explore and conceptualize the development of a Decision Support System (DSS) for supplier selection by integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). Through a systematic review of existing academic literature, this research identifies key criteria commonly used in supplier evaluation, assesses the methodological strengths of AHP and TOPSIS, and proposes a structured framework for their integration in a DSS environment. The findings suggest that the AHP-TOPSIS model offers a balanced combination of qualitative judgment and quantitative analysis, enhancing decision consistency and accuracy. This integrated approach is particularly suitable for dynamic procurement environments requiring robust, transparent, and scalable decision support mechanisms. The study contributes to the theoretical foundation of MCDM applications in supply chain management and provides guidance for practitioners in designing intelligent, criteria-sensitive DSS for supplier selection.
Downloads
References
Ali, S. M., Burney, S. M. A., & Khan, S. Y. (2020). Fuzzy-AHP-TOPSIS: An integrated multi-criteria decision support system for supplier selection in Pakistan’s textile industry.
Anser, M. K., Mohsin, M., Abbas, Q., & Chaudhry, I. S. (2020). Assessing the integration of solar power projects: SWOT-based AHP–F-TOPSIS case study of Turkey. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(25), 31737–31749. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09092-6
Antoniadi, A. M., Du, Y., Guendouz, Y., Wei, L., Mazo, C., Becker, B. A., & Mooney, C. (2021). Current Challenges and Future Opportunities for XAI in Machine Learning-Based Clinical Decision Support Systems: A Systematic Review. Applied Sciences, 11(11), Article 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115088
Arslan, A. E., Arslan, O., & Kandemir, S. Y. (2021). AHP–TOPSIS hybrid decision-making analysis: Simav integrated system case study. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 145(3), 1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10270-4
Asemi, A., Ko, A., & Asemi, A. (2022). The AHP-TOPSIS based DSS for selecting suppliers of information resources. 2022 Second International Conference on Distributed Computing and High Performance Computing (DCHPC), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.1109/DCHPC55044.2022.9732125
Chen, W., Howard, K., Gorham, G., O’Bryan, C. M., Coffey, P., Balasubramanya, B., Abeyaratne, A., & Cass, A. (n.d.). Design, effectiveness, and economic outcomes of contemporary chronic disease clinical decision support systems: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Retrieved July 19, 2025, from https://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocac110
Darzi, M. A. (2024). Overcoming barriers to integrated management systems via developing guiding principles using G-AHP and F-TOPSIS. Expert Systems with Applications, 239, 122305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122305
Ha, N. N. P., Nguyen, D. D., & Le, S. T. Q. (2024). Sustainable supplier selection in the apparel industry: An integrated AHP-TOPSIS model for multi-criteria decision analysis. Research Journal of Textile and Apparel, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-04-2024-0056
Jiménez-Delgado, G., Santos, G., Félix, M. J., Teixeira, P., & Sá, J. C. (2020a). A Combined AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Evaluating the Process of Innovation and Integration of Management Systems in the Logistic Sector. In C. Stephanidis, G. Salvendy, J. Wei, S. Yamamoto, H. Mori, G. Meiselwitz, F. F.-H. Nah, & K. Siau (Eds.), HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media (pp. 535–559). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_40
Jiménez-Delgado, G., Santos, G., Félix, M. J., Teixeira, P., & Sá, J. C. (2020b). A Combined AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Evaluating the Process of Innovation and Integration of Management Systems in the Logistic Sector. In C. Stephanidis, G. Salvendy, J. Wei, S. Yamamoto, H. Mori, G. Meiselwitz, F. F.-H. Nah, & K. Siau (Eds.), HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media (pp. 535–559). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_40
Jiménez-Delgado, G., Santos, G., Félix, M. J., Teixeira, P., & Sá, J. C. (2020c). A Combined AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Evaluating the Process of Innovation and Integration of Management Systems in the Logistic Sector. In C. Stephanidis, G. Salvendy, J. Wei, S. Yamamoto, H. Mori, G. Meiselwitz, F. F.-H. Nah, & K. Siau (Eds.), HCI International 2020 – Late Breaking Papers: Interaction, Knowledge and Social Media (pp. 535–559). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60152-2_40
Jurík, L., Horňáková, N., Šantavá, E., Cagáňová, D., & Sablik, J. (2022). Application of AHP method for project selection in the context of sustainable development. Wireless Networks, 28(2), 893–902. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-020-02322-2
Khan, A. U., & Ali, Y. (2020). ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS (AHP) AND ANALYTIC NETWORK PROCESS METHODS AND THEIR APPLICATIONS: A TWENTY YEAR REVIEW FROM 2000-2019 : AHP & ANP techniques and their applications: Twenty years review from 2000 to 2019. International Journal of the Analytic Hierarchy Process, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.13033/ijahp.v12i3.822
Kumar, R., Irshad Khan, A., Abushark, Y. B., Alam, M. M., Agrawal, A., & Khan, R. A. (2020). An Integrated Approach of Fuzzy Logic, AHP and TOPSIS for Estimating Usable-Security of Web Applications. IEEE Access, 8, 50944–50957. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2970245
Liu, Q., Chen, J., Wang, W., & Qin, Q. (2021). Conceptual Design Evaluation Considering Confidence Based on Z-AHP-TOPSIS Method. Applied Sciences, 11(16), Article 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167400
Masudin, I., Habibah, I. Z., Wardana, R. W., Restuputri, D. P., & Shariff, S. S. R. (2024). Enhancing Supplier Selection for Sustainable Raw Materials: A Comprehensive Analysis Using Analytical Network Process (ANP) and TOPSIS Methods. Logistics, 8(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/logistics8030074
Munier, N., & Hontoria, E. (2021a). Shortcomings of the AHP Method. In N. Munier & E. Hontoria (Eds.), Uses and Limitations of the AHP Method: A Non-Mathematical and Rational Analysis (pp. 41–90). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60392-2_5
Munier, N., & Hontoria, E. (2021b). Uses and Limitations of the AHP Method: A Non-Mathematical and Rational Analysis. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60392-2
Nazarov, A. (2025). DESIGNING A DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM FOR PROJECT EVALUATION USING Z-TOPSIS. European Journal of Economics and Management Sciences, 1, Article 1.
Septiani, W., Pahlevi, R., & Dewayana, T. S. (2023). Decision support system for raw material supplier selection by using fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS method in PT Mulia glass. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2485(1), 020013. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0104985
Sharma, D., Sridhar, S., & Claudio, D. (2020). Comparison of AHP-TOPSIS and AHP-AHP methods in multi-criteria decision-making problems. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 34(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISE.2020.105291
Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. Npj Digital Medicine, 3(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
Taherdoost, H., & Madanchian, M. (2023). Analytic Network Process (ANP) Method: A Comprehensive Review of Applications, Advantages, and Limitations. Journal of Data Science and Intelligent Systems, 1(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewJDSIS3202885
Vasey, B., Nagendran, M., Campbell, B., Clifton, D. A., Collins, G. S., Denaxas, S., Denniston, A. K., Faes, L., Geerts, B., Ibrahim, M., Liu, X., Mateen, B. A., Mathur, P., McCradden, M. D., Morgan, L., Ordish, J., Rogers, C., Saria, S., Ting, D. S. W., … McCulloch, P. (2022). Reporting guideline for the early stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2022-070904
Wang, L., Ali, Y., Nazir, S., & Niazi, M. (2020). ISA Evaluation Framework for Security of Internet of Health Things System Using AHP-TOPSIS Methods. IEEE Access, 8, 152316–152332. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3017221
Yu, C., Zou, Z., Shao, Y., & Zhang, F. (2019). An integrated supplier selection approach incorporating decision maker’s risk attitude using ANN, AHP and TOPSIS methods. Kybernetes, 49(9), 2263–2284. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-04-2019-0223
