A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF PHOTOVOLTAIC MAXIUM POWER POINT TRACKING ALGORITHMS UNDER DYNAMIC WEATHER CONDITIONS

Authors

  • Irvan Malay Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author
  • Dimas Zakyla Akbar Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author
  • Kinaya Arindra Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author
  • Fahryn Al Hafiz Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author
  • Nada Qirania Sakila Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author
  • Syahril Qadar Karo Karo Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author
  • Muhammad Habib Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author
  • Triantono Simarmata Universitas Pembangunan Panca Budi, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

MPPT Algorithm, Solar Panel, Dynamic Weather

Abstract

Based on a literature review of various MPPT algorithms, it can be concluded that each algorithm has its own advantages and limitations depending on the operational conditions of the photovoltaic system. Conventional algorithms such as Perturb and Observe (P&O) and Incremental Conductance (INC) offer a simple structure and easy implementation, but are less responsive to rapid weather changes. Meanwhile, artificial intelligence-based algorithms such as Fuzzy Logic Control (FLC), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) demonstrate superior performance in terms of tracking speed, efficiency, and stability under dynamic conditions. The combination of algorithms or hybrid methods has also been proven to improve system resilience to irradiance and temperature fluctuations. Therefore, the selection of an MPPT algorithm must consider the context of use, such as environmental conditions, hardware capacity, and the overall efficiency needs of the system. With the right approach, MPPT systems can significantly increase the power output of solar panels and support sustainable energy efficiency.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afdilla, H., & Hasibuan, W. R. (2024). Analysis and Comparison of the Performance of K-Means Algorithm and X-Means Algorithm in Disease Type Clustering in Mitra Medika Hospital. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), 4(1), 580–587. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v4i1.696

Aldi, F., Nozomi, I., & Soeheri, S. (2022). Comparison of Drug Type Classification Performance Using KNN Algorithm. SinkrOn, 7(3), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v7i3.11487

Apriadi, E. A., Sriyanto, S., Lestari, S., & Irianto, S. Y. (2024). Comparison of Performance of K-Nearest Neighbors and Neural Network Algorithm in Bitcoin Price Prediction. Sinkron, 8(2), 617–622. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i2.13418

Ayumi, V. (2024). Comparison of Activation Function Performance in the Resnet Algorithm for Rice Type Classification. JSAI (Journal Scientific and Applied Informatics), 7(2), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.36085/jsai.v7i2.6421

Deo, S. P. J., & Setianto, Y. B. D. (2024). COMPARISON OF DECISION TREE ALGORITHM AND K-NEAREST NEIGHBOR (KNN) ALGORITHM PERFORMANCE IN DIABETES CASE STUDY. Proxies : Jurnal Informatika, 6(1), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.24167/proxies.v6i1.12455

Elzalik, M., Enany, T. A., Said, M., & Hassan, A. Y. (2022). Comparison between Cuckoo Search algorithm and Grey Wolf Optimizer Algorithm on Photovoltaic Models Performance. 2022 23rd International Middle East Power Systems Conference (MEPCON), Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/mepcon55441.2022.10021814

Habibie, M. I., Hamie, J., & Goursaud, C. (2022). A Performance Comparison of Classical and Quantum Algorithm for Active User Detection. 2022 IEEE 23rd International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communication (SPAWC), Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/spawc51304.2022.9833942

Hindarto, D. (2023). Performance Comparison ConvDeconvNet Algorithm Vs. UNET for Fish Object Detection. Sinkron, 8(4), 2827–2835. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.13135

Imran, I. A., & Rabbani, M. (2022). Comparison of Deep Learning & Adaptive Algorithm Performance for De-Noising EEG. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2325(1), 12038–12038. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2325/1/012038

Inrawong, P., Kupimai, M., Somwang, P., Kongnok, R., Choohirunwat, P., & Tasuntia, K. (2024). Comparison of YOLO Algorithm Performance in Classifying Harvest Periods for Pleurotus Ostreatus. 2024 International Conference on Power, Energy and Innovations (ICPEI), Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1109/icpei61831.2024.10749025

Kumar, P. M., & Amudha, V. (2023). Performance comparison of threshold segmentation algorithm with k-nearest neighbour for brain tumor detection. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2821(Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38), 30031–30031. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0159120

Li, X., & Kötzing, T. (2024). Algorithm Performance Comparison for Integer-Valued OneMax. Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference Companion, Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 407–410. https://doi.org/10.1145/3638530.3654287

Manandhar, S., Chai, J. Z., & Meng, Y. (2024). Performance Comparison of AT1 Algorithm for a Smaller Ensemble of Atomic Clocks. Proceedings of the 4th URSI Atlantic RadioScience Conference – AT-RASC 2024, Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38. https://doi.org/10.46620/ursiatrasc24/xppo9800

Oktaviani, I. D., & Abdulloh, F. F. (2024). Comparison PSO And IWPSO Performance In Optimizing Decision Tree Algorithm On Heart Disease Dataset. Sinkron, 9(1), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v9i1.13208

Pal, R. R., Chatterjee, S., Majumdar, A., & Poddar, D. R. (2024). Evolutionary Algorithm based Performance Comparison of Small Signal Models for GaN HEMT. Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38. https://doi.org/10.22541/au.172257308.87927211/v1

Pulaganti, M. K., & Veerappan, A. (2023). Performance comparison of convolution neural network classifier with YOLO algorithm to improve brain tumour detection accuracy. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2759(Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38), 20069–20069. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0115444

Riady, M. A., Suyanto, & Sihombing, P. (2024). Agent Performance Comparison of the Q-Learning Algorithm and SARSA Algorithm in Javanese Chess Game. 2024 Ninth International Conference on Informatics and Computing (ICIC), Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/icic64337.2024.10957223

Rosales, S. S., Montiel, O., Orozco-Rosas, U., Tapia, J. J., & Castillo, O. (2024). Comparison of Performance of Amazon Braket Using a Quantum Genetic Algorithm. Computación y Sistemas, 28(3). https://doi.org/10.13053/cys-28-3-5178

Salami, H., Oyediran, A. A., Hitler, I., & Adah, J. N. (2024). Artificial Intelligence Algorithm Of K-Nearest Neighbor (K-Nn) And Its Distance Measures Comparison In Economics Student’s Academic Performance Analysis. Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4981328

Sawant, N., & Khadapkar, D. R. (2022). Comparison of the performance of GaussianNB Algorithm, the K Neighbors Classifier Algorithm, the Logistic Regression Algorithm, the Linear Discriminant Analysis Algorithm, and the Decision Tree Classifier Algorithm on same dataset. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 10(12), 1654–1665. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2022.48311

Siddik, A. Muh. A. (2023). Comparison of Transfer Learning Algorithm Performance in Hand Sign Language Digits Image Classification. Jurnal Matematika, Statistika Dan Komputasi, 20(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.20956/j.v20i1.26503

Siregar, H. A., Raditya, M. Z., Yesa, A. N., & Permana, I. (2024). Comparison of Classification Algorithm Performance for Diabetes Prediction Using Orange Data Mining. Indonesian Journal of Data and Science, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.56705/ijodas.v4i3.103

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Soni, A., & Sharma, N. (2022). Performance assessment and comparison of symmetric and asymmetric augmented data vortex architecture for HPC using efficient algorithm. Soft Computing, 27(7), 4235–4247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-07087-8

Sree, G. L., & Baskar, R. (2024). Performance Analysis of CNN Algorithm in Comparison with LR algorithm for Face Recognition in Smart-Lock. 2024 International Conference on Trends in Quantum Computing and Emerging Business Technologies, Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/tqcebt59414.2024.10545038

Suyanto, S., Mohammad, L., & Asy’ari, M. K. (2024). Performance Comparison of AVPSO and Firefly MPPT Algorithm in Solar Panel Optimization. International Review of Electrical Engineering (IREE), 19(3), 178–178. https://doi.org/10.15866/iree.v19i3.22105

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Tseng, W.-C., Huang, K.-C., & Zhan, D.-S. (2024). Performance Comparison of Deep Reinforcement Learning and Genetic Algorithm for Workflow Scheduling. 2024 10th International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 309–311. https://doi.org/10.1109/icasi60819.2024.10547876

Varma, D. R. D., & Priyanka, R. (2022). Performance Analysis of Novel Iris Monitoring System Based on Canny Detection Algorithm in comparison with Prewitt Algorithm. 2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM), Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 523–527. https://doi.org/10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754088

Zhao, R., Ding, J., Song, T., & Ye, A. (2024). Multi-algorithm comparison and performance evaluation. International Conference on Cloud Computing, Performance Computing, and Deep Learning (CCPCDL 2024), Query date: 2025-07-21 15:50:38, 31–31. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.3050805

Downloads

Published

2025-08-02

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 10 (2025): AUGUST

Section

Articles