FOSTERING DELIBERATIVE GOVERNANCE IN LABOUR SOCIAL INSURANCE POLICY INNOVATION:  THE CASE OF CENTRAL JAVA REGIONAL GOVERNMENT

Authors

  • Tasroh Tasroh Doctorate Program of Public Administration, Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Purwokerto Author
  • Paulus Israwan Setyoko Faculty of Social and Political Science, Universitas Jenderal Soedirman Purwokerto Author
  • Maharani Anjasmoro Hariga Department of Public Administration and Policy, Lancaster Univeratity, UK, London Author

Keywords:

Deliberative Governance, LabourPolicy, Social Insurance

Abstract

Conflicts between labour and regional government continue to occur everywhere. One of the impacts is the problem of the achievement of Employment Social Security participation in Indonesia which is still very low. Data actually stated on November 2024 has only reached 30% of the government's target in 2024 which should have reached 60%. This study aims to explain how deliberation forums (deliberative) in Central Java significantly takes a strategic role in fostering public networking in decison making of labour insurance. By using descriptive-qualitative methods through studies of related policy documents and in-depth interviews with key officials in related agencies, it can be concluded that there are 2 models of deliberative governance in the formulation of labour protection policies that can be developed as an alternative to overcoming the problem of labour protection policy formulation, especially at the local government level. The first is the Elite model, namely policy deliberations managed through collaboration between actors from the government, especially between the executive, legislative and actors from the elements of the Employment Social Security organizers. Second, the “private” model of policy deliberation is a deliberation held collaboratively between actors from the labourur element and the social organization element. The “private” policy deliberation is much more democratic and autonomous, because each actor is free to build interaction patterns and communication flows that are increasingly productive. In brief, through the development of such a deliberative policy model, it has also proven to be a significant innovation in labour protection policies while being able to prevent destructive conflicts and disputes between workers and government in fighting for better labourur social insurance for a safer and more prosperous future for workers as a whole.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Accomplishments, C. (2022). LEGISLATIVE & PUBLIC POLICY PRACTICE.

Alma’arif, & Wargadinata, E. L. (2022). Adopting Open Government in Local Development Planning. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 26(1), 18–32. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap

Alsaadi, A. S. A., & Khudari, M. (2024). The Dynamic Relationship between Good Governance and Economic Growth in Oman. UCJC Business and Society Review, 21(80), 546–607. https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2024.V21.N1.13

Araos, M. (2023). Democracy underwater: public participation, technical expertise, and climate infrastructure planning in New York City. In Theory and Society (Vol. 52, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-021-09459-9

Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7

Astengo, G. (2024). The Voices of the Model. Architectural Histories, 12(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.16995/ah.15230

Azmy, A., Hartono, D. K., & Mirza, M. (2023). The Effect of Organizational Transformation, Organizational Culture, and Transformational Leadership on Employee Performance Through Job Satisfaction: An Evidence from Automotive Component Manufacturing Companies. Management, 27(1), 95–129. https://doi.org/10.58691/man/170437

Bachtira, bachri S. (2017). Meyakinkan Validitas Data Melalui Triangulasi Pada Penelitian Kualitatif. Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 46–62. https://garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/documents/detail/139619

Baxter, S., Barnes, A., Lee, C., Mead, R., & Clowes, M. (2023). Increasing public participation and influence in local decision-making to address social determinants of health: a systematic review examining initiatives and theories. Local Government Studies, 49(5), 861–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2022.2081551

Belghitar, Y., Clark, E., & Saeed, A. (2019). Political connections and corporate financial decision making. In Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (Vol. 53, Issue 4). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-018-0776-8

Benson, J. (2021). The epistemic value of deliberative democracy: how far can diversity take us? Synthese, 199(3–4), 8257–8279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03161-0

Biridlo’i Robby, U., Ardiyansah, & Hariyadi, A. R. (2024). Stakeholder Synergy in Social Innovation: Efforts To Reduce the Impact of Poverty in Indonesia. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 18(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v18n01-031

Cha, Y. H., Donovan, K., Shackley, S., & van der Horst, D. (2024). Place-Based Adaptation through Network Governance. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16052155

Christie, A. P., Morgan, W. H., Salafsky, N., White, T. B., Irvine, R., Boenisch, N., Chiaravalloti, R. M., Kincaid, K., Rezaie, A. M., Yamashita, H., & Sutherland, W. J. (2023). Assessing diverse evidence to improve conservation decision-making. Conservation Science and Practice, 5(10), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/csp2.13024

Chu, T., Haw, I. M., Ho, S. S. M., & Zhang, X. (2020). Labor protection, ownership concentration, and cost of equity capital: international evidence. In Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting (Vol. 54, Issue 4). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-019-00828-1

Chwalisz, C. (2019). A new wave of deliberative democracy. Carnegie Europe, November, 6. https://carnegieendowment.org/files/10-17-19_Chwalisz_Deliberative.pdf

Chwalisz, C. (2020). Good practice principles for deliberative processes for public decision making. Innovative Citizen Participation and New Democratic Institutions, 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1787/b40aab2a-en

Delgado-Baena, A., & Sianes, A. (2024). Power Dynamics in Collaborative Governance Processes: A Case Study of a Disadvantaged Neighbourhood in Southern Spain. Buildings, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14041002

Dexu, H., Min, Z., & Shuonan, Z. (2024). State-Owned Capital Participation in Private Enterprises: A Perspective of Debt Financing. China Economist, 2024(1), 14–42. https://doi.org/10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2024.01.02

Dianto, I., Darta Taifur, W., Handra, H., & Febrianto, R. (2021). Analysis Of The Principles Of Transparency, Participation, Accountability Dan Value For Money In Public Policy Formulation. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 12(13), 3368–3381.

FAO, & Agrinatura. (2019). Organising a Policy Dialogue – A practical guide. 20.

Fath-Hiah, W. N., & Nafi’ah, B. A. (2023). Implementasi Program Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan Pada Pekerja Formal Di BPJS Ketenagakerjaan Tanjung Perak. Public Inspiration : Jurnal Administrasi Publik, 8(2), 67–75. https://doi.org/10.22225/pi.8.2.2023.67-75

Febiola, S., Tundjung, D., & Sitabuana, H. (2022). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Ketenagakerjaan Terhadap Pekerja / Buruh Di Indonesia. Serina Iv Untar, 535–542.

Fishkin, J. S. (2021). Deliberative Public Consultation via Deliberative Polling: Criteria and Methods. Hastings Center Report, 51(S2), S19–S24. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.1316

Gherghina, S., Hasić, J., & Miscoiu, S. (2023). Ethnic groups and constitutional deliberation: Understanding participation in Bosnia-Herzegovina and Romania. Deliberative Constitution-Making: Opportunities and Challenges, 77–90. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003327165-6

Gordon, D., McKay, S., Marchildon, G., Sacha Bhatia, R., & Shaw, J. (2020). Collaborative governance for integrated care: Insights from a policy stakeholder dialogue. International Journal of Integrated Care, 20(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijic.4684

Hammersley, M. (2023). Are There Assessment Criteria for Qualitative Findings ? A Challenge Facing Mixed Methods Research 2 . What Are Criteria ? To answer this question , we need to step back in order to examine the nature of. 24(1).

Hammond, M., Owusu, N. O., Nunoo, E. K., Boampong, G., Osman, A., Panin, A., Nyametso, J. K., & Essen, B. (2023). How quality of work-life influence employee job satisfaction in a gas processing plant in Ghana. Discover Sustainability, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-023-00127-9

He, B. (2018). Deliberative citizenship and deliberative governance: a case study of one deliberative experimental in China. Citizenship Studies, 22(3), 294–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621025.2018.1424800

Kepp, K. P., Aavitsland, P., Ballin, M., Balloux, F., Baral, S., Bardosh, K., Bauchner, H., Bendavid, E., Bhopal, R., Blumstein, D. T., Boffetta, P., Bourgeois, F., Brufsky, A., Collignon, P. J., Cripps, S., Cristea, I. A., Curtis, N., Djulbegovic, B., Faude, O., … Ioannidis, J. P. A. (2024). Panel stacking is a threat to consensus statement validity. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111428

Kim, D., & Choi, C. (2020). Civil society and labour rights protection in asia and the pacific. Pacific Affairs, 93(1), 89–127. https://doi.org/10.5509/202093189

Knappe, H. (2019). Participatory and Deliberative Democracy: Doing Democracy Differently, 45–76. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvbkk41f.8

Koutras, N. (2020). The Public Policy Basis for Open Access Publishing: A Scientific Approach. Publishing Research Quarterly, 36(4), 538–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-020-09772-8

Kuci, A., Daragmeh, A., & Sági, J. (2023). The role and challenges of governments in promoting sustainable development. Prosperitas, 11(In press), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.31570/prosp_2023_0057

Le, N., Siddique, A. B., Jamour, F., Oymak, S., & Hristidis, V. (2021). Predictable and Adaptive Goal-oriented Dialog Policy Generation. Proceedings - 2021 IEEE 15th International Conference on Semantic Computing, ICSC 2021, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC50631.2021.00012

Lu, P., Zhou, L., & Fan, X. (2023). Platform governance and sociological participation. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-023-00181-w

Malaian, K., Myasnikov, V., & Balueva, A. (2019). Optimization of costs for labor protection of the enterprise. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 666(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/666/1/012092

Mancilla García, M., Abunge, C., Bandeira, S. O., Cheupe, C., Combane, D. J., Daw, T., Drury O’Neill, E. M., Hertz, T., Mubai, M., Muthiga, N., Sonetti González, T., & Shauri, H. (2024). Exploring a process-relational approach to qualitative research methods for sustainability science. People and Nature, January 2022, 1512–1523. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10667

Manosevitch, I. (2024). Cultivating Deliberative Citizenship Orientations in Communication Studies. 18, 4511–4532.

Matindas, C. L. (2018). Analisis Hukum KetenagakerjaanTentang Perlindungan Buruh/Pekerja Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003. Lex Privatum, VI(3), 149–157.

McCoy, M. S., Ward, M., Neergaard, R., Joffe, S., & Szymczak, J. E. (2024). Managing institutional conflicts: Stakeholder accounts of communication between conflict of interest and technology transfer offices. PLoS ONE, 19(8 AUGUST), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0304519

Mudhofar, M. (2021). Performance Allowance, Motivation, Employees’ Work Achievement And Organizational Performance Among Goverment Employees. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 25(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.22146/jkap.59680

Mukhitdinov, R. D. (2024). Innovation Policy Coordination: The Role of Communication for Uzbekistan. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 17(1), 120–141. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2024-0006

Nae, T. M., Florescu, M. S., & Bălășoiu, G. I. (2024). Towards Social Justice: Investigating the Role of Labor, Globalization, and Governance in Reducing Socio-Economic Inequality within Post-Communist Countries. Sustainability (Switzerland) , 16(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16062234

Nikmah Dalimunthe, Ariyadi Ariyadi, Agung Setia, Dwi Nur Annisa, Indah Khuzaimah, Dwi Indah Pertiwi, Egi Fadilah Saragih, Nadiah Rizki Nasution, & Irfan Iskandar. (2023). Peran Kebijakan Perlindungan Ketenagakerjaan Dalam Meningkatkan Kesejahteraan Pekerja. Jurnal Manajemen Riset Inovasi, 1(3), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.55606/mri.v1i3.1314

Pananrangi M, A. (2019). Inovasi Kebijakan Publik Dalam Perpektif Administrasi Publik. Jurnal Meraja, 2(3), 1–13.

Parker, M. J., & Dodge, M. (2023). An exploratory study of deferred prosecution agreements and the adjudication of corporate crime. Journal of Financial Crime, 30(4), 940–954. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFC-06-2022-0122

Pek, S. (2023). Reconceptualizing and Improving Member Participation in Large Cooperatives: Insights from Deliberative Democracy and Deliberative Mini-Publics. Management (France), 26(4), 68–82. https://doi.org/10.37725/mgmt.2023.8478

Pemerintah Provinsi Jawa Tengah. (2021). Buku Data Statistik Ketenagakerjaan dan Ketransmigrasian Tahun 2021. 1–105. http://disnakertrans.jatengprov.go.id

Pera, M., & Bussu, S. (2024). Towards Democratisation of Public Administration: Public-Commons Partnerships in Barcelona. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 164–176. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1385

Pesch, U. (2008). The publicness of public administration. Administration and Society, 40(2), 170–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399707312828

Plans, D., Case, T., Kırcami, A., & Erku, H. (2024). Deliberative Democracy and Making Sustainable and Legitimate.

Riska Chyntia Dewi, & Suparno Suparno. (2022). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Jurnal Media Administrasi, 7(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.56444/jma.v7i1.67

Riyoldi, R., Zulkarnaen, Z., & Patriani, I. (2022). Analisis Dynamic Governance DalamImplementasi Kebijakan Inovasi Pelayanan Pada Dinas Kependudukan Dan Pencatatan SipilKota Pontianak. PublikA Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Negara (e-Journal), 11(1), 179–198.

Saleh, C., Hendrik, E., Zauhar, S., & Nuh, M. (2021). Collaborative Governance in Public Administration Perspective. In Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University (Vol. 56, Issue 6, pp. 655–665). https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.56.6.58

Saner, M., Körner, M., & Lugschitz, R. (2023). 11 Diversity and inclusion. Breimer 2020. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781032630410-16

Saptawan, A. (2019). Actor Networking in Forest Fires Mitigation, Ogan Komering Ilir District, South Sumatra Province, Indonesia Alamsyah Department of Public Administration …. JKAP (Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik), 23(2), 92–110. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Alamsyah_Alamsyah/publication/339138698_Actor_Networking_in_Forest_Fires_Mitigation_Ogan_Komering_Ilir_District_South_Sumatra_Province_Indonesia/links/5e40c24e299bf1cdb91be061/Actor-Networking-in-Forest-Fires-Mitigatio

Sari, I., & Suswanta. (2023). Narrative Policy Framework: Indonesia’s Capital City Relocation Policy. Jurnal Kebijakan Dan Administrasi Publik, 27(1), 80–92. https://journal.ugm.ac.id/jkap

Sergeenko, Y. S., Galkina, O. V., Zametina, T. V., Kombarova, E. V., & Petrov, D. E. (2020). Digitalization of Safety in the Field of Labor Protection. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 543(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/543/1/012001

Setälä, M. (2021). Advisory, Collaborative and Scrutinizing Roles of Deliberative Mini-Publics. Frontiers in Political Science, 2(January), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2020.591844

Shen, X., Wu, A., Ding, Y., Sun, Q., & Liu, M. (2024). Employee education, labor protection intensity and auditor risk perception. In PLoS ONE (Vol. 19, Issue 6 June). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298938

Siregar Timboel dkk. (2020). Upaya Peningkatan Kepesertaan dan Manfaat Jaminan Sosial Ketenagakerjaan Laporan Studi Juli 2019 - Februari 2020. 9.

Sørensen, E., & Bentzen, T. (2020). Public administrators in interactive democracy: a multi-paradigmatic approach. Local Government Studies, 46(1), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1627335

Studies, M., Studies, M., Studies, M., & Studies, M. (2023). New Public Governance and Undermining of the Public Interest in Zambia Moses Chewe Clever Madimutsa Evans Daka Justina Namukombo. 3(2), 5–26.

Syofyan, Y., & Gusman, D. (2023). Studi Perbandingan Sistem Jaminan Sosial Antara Indonesia Dan Malaysia Dalam Rangka Pemenuhan Hak Kesehatan Di Indonesia. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(1), 208. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i1.325

Wei, W., & Muratova, Y. (2022). Executive power and politically connected independent directors: evidence from China. Asian Business and Management, 21(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41291-020-00104-4

Weiland, S., Hickmann, T., Lederer, M., Marquardt, J., & Schwindenhammer, S. (2021). The 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Transformative change through the sustainable development goals? Politics and Governance, 9(1), 90–95. https://doi.org/10.17645/PAG.V9I1.4191

Xiang, H., Wang, X., Wang, Y., Yang, Y., Yang, C., Huang, X., Bu, Y., & Wang, M. (2023). What Is the Rational Choice of Community Governance Policy. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032395

Zhu, B., Liu, S., Li, H., Gao, Y., Chen, T., Sun, C., & Li, W. (2021). The effect evaluation of labor protection equipment allocation in power supply enterprises: A study of central provinces in China. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1802(2), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1802/2/022100

Downloads

Published

2025-03-06

Issue

Section

Articles