ELECTORAL SYSTEM AND POLITICAL STABILITY: IMPLICATIONS FOR PEOPLE'S WELFARE

Authors

  • Era Purike Prodi Perhotelan Politeknik Pajajaran ICB Bandung Author

Keywords:

Election System, Political Stability, Implications for People's Welfare

Abstract

The electoral system plays a vital role in determining the quality of a country's political governance and stability, which in turn affects the welfare of the people. The choice of system, whether proportional, majoritarian, or mixed, has implications for political representation and the accountability of the elected government. An effective system encourages political stability by ensuring fair representation and a non-centralised distribution of power. Strong political stability allows the government to focus on sustainable development policies, create a healthy investment climate, and improve public services, all of which are important for the welfare of the community. However, stability must be in harmony with inclusiveness so as not to marginalise certain groups and maintain the essence of democracy. The balance between political stability and inclusiveness is the key to ensuring sustainable development and equitable welfare across all levels of society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Albano, F. (2022). Electoral Thresholds and Party System Fragmentation in Italy. Italian Political Science Journal, 12(1), 48–67.

Bedford, J., & Martin, C. (2023). Climate Policy and Electoral Politics in the European Union. Environmental Politics, 32(2), 220–240.

Birch, S. (2001). Electoral systems and political transformation in post-communist Europe. Comparative Politics, 33(3), 253–272.

Chen, W. (2023). Authoritarian Resilience and Political Stability in Contemporary China. Journal of East Asian Studies, 20(1), 30–55.

Dubois, L., & François, P. (2023). European Electoral Systems and Party System Stability. West European Politics, 46(3), 570–590.

Garcia, M. (2023). Electoral Accountability and Public Policy: Lessons from Spanish Municipalities. Policy Studies Journal, 51(1), 78–99.

Gerring, J., & Thacker, S. C. (2004). Political institutions and corruption: The role of unitarism and parliamentarism. British Journal of Political Science, 34(3), 295–330.

Jensen, C. (2015). Political Stability and Economic Welfare in Modern Democracies: Reconsidering the Cause and Effect Relationship. University of Copenhagen.

Kamel, O. (2023). Political Economy of Development in the Middle East: Elections and Economic Diversification. Middle East Journal, 77(1), 45–67.

Kim, S. (2023). Electoral Reform and Political Behavior in South Korea. The Korean Journal of International Studies, 20(1), 100–120.

Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews. Keele University Technical Report, 33(55), 1–26.

Lee, H. (2022). Digital Technology and Political Participation among Youth in South Korea. Pacific Affairs, 95(3), 415–437.

Martinez, S. (2022). Impact of Social Media on Political Campaigning: Evidence from Latin America. International Journal of Communication, 17(4), 435–455.

Miller, A. R. (2023). Power Dynamics in Modern Democracies: Structure and Change. Routledge. https://www.routledge.com/Power-Dynamics-in-Modern-Democracies/Miller/p/book/9780367568230

Norris, P. (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge University Press. https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/electoral-engineering/329D0123249751B5D73E8BDEFDA95535

Paré, G., & Trudel, M.-C. (2007). Knowledge Management in Health Care. Journal of Health Information Management, 21(3), 64–74.

Patel, R., & Singh, A. (2023). Electoral Violence and Democracy: The Case of India. Journal of Democracy, 34(3), 89–108.

Simmons, J., & Hernandez, A. (2023). Corruption and Political Trust in Latin American Democracies. Latin American Research Review, 58(2), 101–120.

Smith, J. M. (2002). Electoral Systems and Their Impact on Political Stability and Economic Performance in Democracies [University of California]. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6f0142c3

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature Review as a Research Methodology: An Overview and Guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339.

Taylor, M., & Johnson, R. (2022). Electoral Reforms in Emerging Democracies: A Case Study of Ghana. Comparative Political Studies, 60(3), 345–367.

Wang, L., & Zhou, X. (2023). Populism and Mass Mobilization: The Case of Contemporary Brazil. Latin American Politics and Society, 65(1), 5–28.

Yuan, Y., & Hunt, R. H. (2009). Systematic Reviews: The Rationale and the Challenges of the Three Main Types of Reviews. European Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 21(6), 565–566.

Downloads

Published

2025-03-08

Issue

Section

Articles