ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE (AI) AND AUTOMATION IN TAX LAW ENFORCEMENT
Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), Automation, Tax Law EnforcementAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) and automation are changing the way tax law enforcement is conducted. These technologies offer advanced analytics capabilities that can identify tax fraud and law violations more effectively through complex data analysis. With automation, processes administrative can be streamlined, reducing human error and improving efficiency and speed in handling tax law cases. In addition, the application of these technologies has the potential to increase transparency and accountability in the tax system, provide more accurate and faster services to taxpayers and ensure fair application of regulations. Thus, AI and automation not only improve compliance and reduce operational costs, but also build public trust in the tax system.
Downloads
References
Alemanno, A. (2020). AI and Legal Drafting: New Challenges and Perspectives. European Journal of Law and Technology,11 (1), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3553602
Binns, R. (2020). Fairness in Machine Learning: Lessons from Political Philosophy. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, FAT* '20, 149-159. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351095.3372869
Castelnovo, A. (2020). Judicial Control of Algorithmic Decisions: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Law and Information Technology,28 (3), 202-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaaa013
Estevez, E. (2020). Rule-based versus AI-driven Decision Making: Ethical and Legal Aspects. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine,39 (1), 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2020.2980312
Garapon, A. (2020). The Role of AI in the Judiciary: Opportunities and Challenges. Artificial Intelligence and Law,28 (4), 128-142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-020-09268-x
Gil, J. D. (2020). Assessing the Impact of AI on Legal Services. Journal of Legal Studies & Research,24 (1), 13-28. https://doi.org/10.7906/inddll-e-0242
Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108.
Hall, N. L. (2020). Legal Implications of AI in Healthcare. Health Law Journal,23 (2), 171-192. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3711226
Leenes, R. (2020). Algorithms and the Law: The Case for Regulatory Explanation. Journal of Law, Technology & Policy,2020 (1), 1-29. https://doi.org/10.1525/nclr.2020.23.1.1
Lombardi, G. (2020). Exploring AI's Potential in the Legal Field: Current Use Cases and Future Trends. Legal Technology Journal,32 (3), 204-230. https://doi.org/10.18193/jlt.2020.03.02
Marsden, C. T. (2020). Regulating AI and Machine Learning: Setting the Also Rules. Internet Policy Review,9 (2), 1-24. https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.2.1451
McCarthy, J. (2020). Predictive Policing: The Role of AI in Law Enforcement. Information Systems Frontiers,22 (1 SP-1), 13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-019-09943-1
Muller, P. M. (2020). Ethical Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Data Privacy. Journal of Business Ethics,167 (1), 107-132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04170-y
Okoli, C. (2015). A Guide to Conducting a Standalone Systematic Literature Review. Springer.
Park, R. J. (2020). Transparency in AI Decision Making: A Causal Explanation Approach. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research,69 (1), 201-231. https://doi.org/10.1613/jair.1.11447
Randolph, J. (2009). A Guide to Writing the Dissertation Literature Review. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 14(13), 1–13.
Shu, Y. (2020). The Influence of Machine Learning on Legal Forecasting. The Columbia Science and Technology Law Review,23 (1), 116-145. https://doi.org/10.7282/T3-8K2Z-GJ22
Villa, L. (2020). Regulating the Algorithms: Implications for Democracy and Rule of Law. Journal of Law, Technology, and the Internet,11 (1), 21-43. https://doi.org/10.1109/JLTI.2020.872368
Waldman, A. E. (2020). Law, Privacy, and the Ethics of Big Data Analytics. Vanderbilt Journal of Entertainment & Technology Law,23 (2), 343-367. https://doi.org/10.3886/E123455V2
