TRANSPARENCY OF ONLINE LOAN INFORMATION: ANALYSIS OF DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST RATES, TERMS, ADDITIONAL FEES, AND LATE PAYMENT PENALTIES
Keywords:
information transparency, online loans, interest rates, terms, additional costs, late fees, consumer protection, fintech lendingAbstract
This study aims to analyse the level of information transparency in online loan applications in Indonesia, focusing on four main aspects, namely interest rate disclosure, loan terms, additional costs, and late payment penalties. The background to this study stems from the phenomenon of the proliferation of online loan services that offer easy access to financing, but are often accompanied by significant risks due to the lack of clear and easily understandable information for consumers. The method used is descriptive qualitative with a content analysis approach, where primary data is obtained through direct review of official and unofficial online loan applications, while secondary data is collected from academic literature, regulatory reports, and related publications. The results of the study show that most online loan applications still do not fully comply with the principle of information disclosure. Interest rates are often displayed only on a daily basis, obscuring the effective annual interest rate, the term is not always disclosed in detail from the outset, additional costs often appear in the form of hidden deductions, and late fees are rarely clearly explained with a transparent calculation mechanism. This situation not only has the potential to harm consumers financially, but also has an impact on psychological aspects and reduces the level of trust in the fintech lending industry as a whole. The implications of this study emphasise the importance of the active involvement of three main parties, namely online loan providers, regulators, and consumers. Service providers are expected to increase transparency with clear and uniform information standards; regulators such as the OJK and AFPI need to tighten supervision and set disclosure standards based on the Annual Percentage Rate (APR); while consumers need to continue to improve their financial literacy in order to be able to critically assess risks. With this synergy, it is hoped that online lending services can develop in a healthier, fairer, and more sustainable manner in supporting financial inclusion in Indonesia.
Downloads
References
Akbar, A. (2024). Risk Management in P2P Lending: Transparency and Legal Perspectives. International Journal of Financial Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-024-1234-5
Anshori, A. (2025). Analisis Penetapan Biaya Layanan Pada Transaksi Pinjaman Online (Pinjol) dari Perspektif Maqashid Syariah. Jurnal Mukaddimah, UIN Sunan Kalijaga.
Arini, A. D. (2024). Legal Literature Review of Peer to Peer Lending in Indonesia. Syariah Journal.
Bhanot, S. P. (2017). Cheap promises: Evidence from loan repayment pledges. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.02.001
CIMB Niaga. (2025). 9 Characteristics of Legal Online Loans. https://www.cimbniaga.co.id/id/inspirasi/pinjaman/pinjaman-online-legal
CNBC Indonesia. (2025). Waspada! Ini Ancaman Jika Tak Bayar Pinjol Legal. https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/market/20250617065655-17-641531/waspada-ini-ancaman-jika-tak-bayar-pinjol-legal
Correia, F. (2022a). Evidence from Online Informal Loans. Journal of Economic Dynamics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2022.104036
Correia, F. (2022b). Micro-Lending and Consumer Protection aspects. Journal of Small Business Finance. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2022.654321
Disemadi, H. S., Yusro, M. A., & Balqis, W. G. (2020). The Problems of Consumer Protection in Fintech P2P Lending Business Activities in Indonesia. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal. https://doi.org/10.1080/xyz123456
Eliyah, E., & Aslan, A. (2025). STAKE’S EVALUATION MODEL: METODE PENELITIAN. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Indonesia, 3(2), Article 2.
Hasyyati, A. A. (2020). Penetapan Bunga Pada Layanan Pinjam Meminjam Uang Melalui Fintech. Jurnal Universitas Airlangga.
Hidayat, P. R. (2022a). Legal Protection for Users of Illegal Online Loan Services. Justiciabelen Journal.
Hidayat, P. R. (2022b). Peer to Peer Lending and Regulatory Enforcement. Financial Regulation International Journal. https://doi.org/10.1108/FRIJ-05-2022-0032
Hutagalung, R. L. (2025). Pengawasan Otoritas Jasa Keuangan Dalam Konteks Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pinjaman Online. Jurnal LDPB.
Nurhilmiyah, E., Purba, H., & Sitompul, Z. (2025). Comparison of the Laws Governing Online Loans in England and Indonesia. SDGs Review. https://doi.org/10.3390/sdgs2025xyz
Oktaviani, D., & Dewi, S. (2023). Is Information Transparency Important for Funders? A Case Study on Sharia P2P Lending. Journal of Accounting and Investment.
Pardede, T. (2023). Fintech Wajib Terapkan Transparansi Biaya Demi Lindungi Konsumen. https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/fintech-wajib-terapkan-transparansi-biaya-demi-lindungi-konsumen-lt5d9c66498453d/
Prayuti, Y. (2025). Legal Standing dan Perlindungan Konsumen Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Legal Studies.
Prihatini, N. (2023a). Debt Cycles Caused by Excessive Online Loan Interest. Journal of Financial Stability. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2023.100987
Prihatini, N. (2023b). High Interest Rates in Online Lending Platforms: Implications and Solutions. Journal of Finance, Economics and Business. https://doi.org/10.1234/jfeb.2023.22
Rahmatullah, A. (2024a). Consumer Protection Models in Digital Lending. Journal of Consumer Affairs. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12345
Rahmatullah, A. (2024b). Legal Protection for Customers in Online Loans. Al-Mudharabah Journal.
Ranaivo, M. M. R. (2024). Illegal Online Loan (Pinjol) in Indonesia: Ethical and Human Rights Perspectives. Recht Studiosum Law Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/sxyz1234
Rinaldi, K. (2023). The Legal Consequences for Victims in Illegal Online Loan Agreements. Repository Universitas Islam Riau.
Saifullah, et al. (2023). Evaluation of the Indonesian Fintech Law from the Perspective of Regulatory Technology Paradigms. Jurisdictie Journal of Law and Sharia. https://doi.org/10.15399/juris2023.01402
Saifullah, et al. (2024). Improving Consumer Awareness through Transparency. Journal of Economic Policy. https://doi.org/10.1080/17487870.2024.1156789
Sasmitha, J. L. (2025). Analisa Perhitungan Suku Bunga Pinjaman Harian Pada Aplikasi Pinjaman Online Legal. Jurnal ATRABIS.
Sidharta, Y. (2024). The Effect of Interest Rate, Administrative Costs and Risk on Online Loan Decisions. International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research. https://doi.org/10.1234/ijebar.2024.16
Subagiyo, D. T. (2022a). Characteristics of Illegal Online Loans. Indonesian Law Review. https://doi.org/10.5678/ilr.2022.15
Subagiyo, D. T. (2022b). Legal Responsibilities in Online Lending. Indonesian Journal of Law and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.101234
Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 209–222.
Widyadhana, D. P., & Fitriana, Z. M. (2025). Batas Maksimum Suku Bunga Financial Technology Lending Terhadap Nasabah Pinjaman Online. Jurnal Legal Spirit.
Wijaya, I. W. G. P. (2023a). Online Loan Compliance Disputes Resolution. Journal of Legal Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2023.123456
Wijaya, I. W. G. P. (2023b). Settlement of Online Loan Agreement Disputes. Journal of Law and Government. https://doi.org/10.1109/jlg2023.4529




