ENHANCING CREATIVE THINKING THROUGH COMPUTATIONAL THINKING LEARNING STRATEGIES USING GITHUB IN VOCATIONAL SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION FOR 11TH-GRADE STUDENTS AT STATE VOCATIONAL HIGHSCHOOL 1 OF SURABAYA (SMK NEGERI 1 SURABAYA)
Keywords:
Creative Thinking Enhancement, Computational Thinking, GitHub, Vocational Software EngineeringAbstract
This study is a systematic literature review (SLR) on enhancing creative thinking through computational thinking learning strategies using GitHub in vocational Software Engineering (RPL) education for 11th-grade students at SMK Negeri 1 Surabaya. The objective of this article is to collect, analyze, and synthesize findings from previous studies to gain a deeper understanding of the relationship between computational thinking, GitHub, and creative thinking in vocational RPL education. The research method used in this SLR article is library research, with sources obtained from the Scopus (Elsevier) and Emerald Publishing databases. Data analysis from previous studies follows the PRISMA method. The findings indicate that creativity enhancement can be achieved through an effective curriculum. Computational thinking needs to be integrated into the curriculum to equip students with skills aligned with digital technology advancements. GitHub serves as a digital tool that fosters innovation and creativity. The study’s implications encourage schools to integrate computational thinking into the RPL curriculum to equip students with problem-solving skills relevant to digital technology developments.
Downloads
References
AlMarzouq, M., AlZaidan, A., & AlDallal, J. (2020). Mining GitHub for research and education: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Web Information Systems, 16(4), 451–473. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWIS-03-2020-0016
Azmat, F., Lim, W. M., Moyeen, A., Voola, R., & Gupta, G. (2023). Convergence of business, innovation, and sustainability at the tipping point of the sustainable development goals. Journal of Business Research, 167(December 2022), 114170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.114170
Bai, S., Liu, L., Meng, C., & Liu, H. (2023). Automating discussion structure re-organization for GitHub issues. Expert Systems with Applications, 225(April), 120024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120024
Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., & Ismail, M. A. B. (2020). The landscape of research on the use of digital game-based learning apps to nurture creativity among young children: A review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(February), 100666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100666
Blut, M., & Wang, C. (2020). Technology readiness: a meta-analysis of conceptualizations of the construct and its impact on technology usage. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(4), 649–669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-019-00680-8
Chen, M., Sinha, A., Hu, K., & Shah, M. I. (2021). Impact of technological innovation on energy efficiency in industry 4.0 era: Moderation of shadow economy in sustainable development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 164(December 2020), 120521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120521
Cheng, X., Zhang, Z., Yang, Y., & Yan, Z. (2020). Open collaboration between universities and enterprises: a case study on GitHub. Internet Research, 30(4), 1251–1279. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-01-2019-0013
Dilekçi, A., & Karatay, H. (2023). The effects of the 21st century skills curriculum on the development of students’ creative thinking skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 47(January), 101229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101229
Efgivia, M. G., Adora Rinanda, R. ., Suriyani, Hidayat, A., Maulana, I., & Budiarjo, A. (2021). Analysis of Constructivism Learning Theory. Proceedings of the 1st UMGESHIC International Seminar on Health, Social Science and Humanities (UMGESHIC-ISHSSH 2020), 585, 208–212. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211020.032
Escamilla, E., Klein, M., Cooper, T., Rampin, V., Weigle, M. C., & Nelson, M. L. (2022). The Rise of GitHub in Scholarly Publications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Including Subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), 13541 LNCS, 187–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-16802-4_15
Henriksen, D., Richardson, C., & Shack, K. (2020). Mindfulness and creativity: Implications for thinking and learning. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100689
Huang, N. tang, Chang, Y. shan, & Chou, C. hui. (2020). Effects of creative thinking, psychomotor skills, and creative self-efficacy on engineering design creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(March), 100695. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100695
Hutchins, N. M., Biswas, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., Grover, S., Wolf, R., Blair, K. P., Chin, D., Conlin, L., Basu, S., & McElhaney, K. (2020). C2STEM: a System for Synergistic Learning of Physics and Computational Thinking. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(1), 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-019-09804-9
Iddrisu Bariham. (2022). Senior High School Teachers’ and Students’ Perception about the Integration of Online Learning and Its Impact on Their Application of Technology in Teaching and Learning of Social Studies in Northern Region, Ghana. Social Education Research, 3(1), 161–174. https://doi.org/10.37256/ser.3120221268
Iman, N., Amanda, M. T., & Angela, J. (2022). Digital transformation for maritime logistics capabilities improvement: cases in Indonesia. Marine Economics and Management, 5(2), 188–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/maem-01-2022-0002
Khan, A., Chenggang, Y., Hussain, J., & Kui, Z. (2021). Impact of technological innovation, financial development and foreign direct investment on renewable energy, non-renewable energy and the environment in belt & Road Initiative countries. Renewable Energy, 171, 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.075
Li, Y., Schoenfeld, A. H., diSessa, A. A., Graesser, A. C., Benson, L. C., English, L. D., & Duschl, R. A. (2020). Computational Thinking Is More about Thinking than Computing. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00030-2
Liu, S., Peng, C., & Srivastava, G. (2023). What influences computational thinking? A theoretical and empirical study based on the influence of learning engagement on computational thinking in higher education. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 31(6), 1690–1704. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.22669
Nguyen, N., & Nadi, S. (2022). An Empirical Evaluation of GitHub Copilot’s Code Suggestions. In Proceedings - 2022 Mining Software Repositories Conference, MSR 2022 (Vol. 1, Issue 1). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3524842.3528470
Relkin, E., de Ruiter, L. E., & Bers, M. U. (2021). Learning to code and the acquisition of computational thinking by young children. Computers and Education, 169(April), 104222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104222
Saad, A., & Zainudin, S. (2022). A review of Project-Based Learning (PBL) and Computational Thinking (CT) in teaching and learning. Learning and Motivation, 78(March). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2022.101802
Savić, M., Ivanović, M., Luković, I., Delibašić, B., Protić, J., & Janković, D. (2020). Students’ preferences in selection of computer science and informatics studies a comprehensive empirical case study. Computer Science and Information Systems, 18(1), 251–283. https://doi.org/10.2298/CSIS200901054S
Segundo Marcos, R. I., López Ferández, V., Daza González, M. T., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36(June 2019), 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663
Septiandari, F., Wardoyo, C., & Wardana3, L. W. (2024). Strategy The Effect of Marketing and Digital Literacy Through Social Media Marketing on Visiting Decisions. Asian Journal of Management Analytics, 3(2), 311–328. https://doi.org/10.55927/ajma.v3i2.8060
Su, J., & Yang, W. (2023). A systematic review of integrating computational thinking in early childhood education. Computers and Education Open, 4(August 2022), 100122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100122
Suherman, S., & Vidákovich, T. (2022). Assessment of mathematical creative thinking: A systematic review. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 44(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101019
Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37(June), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682
Tan, X., Zhou, M., & Sun, Z. (2020). A first look at good first issues on GitHub. ESEC/FSE 2020 - Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint Meeting European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, 398–409. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3409746
Weng, X., Chiu, T. K. F., & Tsang, C. C. (2022). Promoting student creativity and entrepreneurship through real-world problem-based maker education. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 45(January), 101046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101046
Wermelinger, M. (2023). Using GitHub Copilot to Solve Simple Programming Problems. SIGCSE 2023 - Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 1, 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/3545945.3569830
Zhao, Y., Gong, L., Yang, W., & Zhou, Y. (2024). How accessibility affects other quality attributes of software? A case study of GitHub. Science of Computer Programming, 231, 103027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scico.2023.103027
