CONTINUOUS EVALUATION APPROACH: CONTROL STRATEGIES TOWARDS PROGRAM SUCCESS
Keywords:
continuous evaluation, control strategy, program success, participation, organizational cultureAbstract
Continuous evaluation is a strategic approach that places the evaluation process as an iterative and integrated cycle in each program stage. This article analyzes how continuous evaluation can serve as an effective control strategy towards program success. Using a qualitative research method based on case studies, data is obtained through interviews, observations, and document analysis, which is then analyzed thematically. The study results show that continuous evaluation strengthens program control through early detection of problems, improved decision-making quality, and resource use efficiency. In addition, the participation of external stakeholders has been proven to increase the legitimacy of the evaluation results while strengthening the sense of ownership of the program. Organizational culture factors also play an important role, where a culture of learning and openness has been shown to support the effectiveness of evaluations. These findings confirm that continuous evaluation serves as a technical instrument and a social and strategic mechanism in maintaining the program's success. The practical implications of this study are the importance of integrating evaluation into management control systems, while its theoretical implications encourage the development of more participatory and adaptive evaluation models. Thus, continuous evaluation can be a catalyst for innovation and consistent improvement of program quality.
References
Adam, M. I., Sanosra, A., & Susbiani, A. (2020). Pengaruh Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan Serta Kompetensi Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi dan Kinerja Pegawai. Jurnal Sains Manajemen Dan Bisnis Indonesia, 10(1), 109–123.
Aspani, G. C., Sendow, G. M., & Tampenawas, J. L. A. (2022). Pengaruh Lingkungan Organisasi, Etos Kerja dan Hubungan Kerja terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Hotel Sahid Kawanua Manado. Jurnal EMBA: Jurnal Riset Ekonomi, Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akuntansi, 10(2), 63–72.
Direktorat Sekolah Dasar. (2021). Kemendikbud Luncurkan Program Sekolah. https://ditpsd.kemdikbud.go.id/public/artikel/detail/kemendikbud-luncurkan-program-sekolah-penggerak
Ford, S., & Despeisse, M. (2016). Additive manufacturing and sustainability: an exploratory study of the advantages and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137, 1573–1587.
Ghazali, I. (2011). Desain Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Semarang: Yoga Pratama.
Muliadi, D. (2023). Manajemen Pengelolaan dan Pengembangan Usaha pada UMKM di Kabupaten Bogor (Studi Kasus pada Usaha Makanan Fast Food). Journal on Education, 5(4), 10976–10988.
Mulyaningsih, T., Daly, A., & Miranti, R. (2015). Foreign participation and banking competition: Evidence from the Indonesian banking industry. Journal of Financial Stability, 19, 70–82.
Muthmainnah, M., Jati, S. P., & Suryoputro, A. (2016). Stakeholder Pemerintah Sebagai Prime Mover Keberhasilan Jejaring Pelayanan Kesehatan Peduli Remaja. Jurnal Promosi Kesehatan Indonesia, 9(1), 45–55.
Nasution, A. F. (2023). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif (M. Albina (ed.); Ke-I). CV. Harfa Creative.
Sarwono, J. (2006). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Graha Ilmu.
Sugiyono. (2010). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif.
Suharyani, Y. D., & Djumarno, D. (2023). Perencanaan Strategis Dan Pembangunan Berkelanjutan. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 4(2), 767–778. https://doi.org/10.55681/jige.v4i2.827
Suparmoko, M. (2020). Konsep Pembangunan Berkelanjutan Dalam Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Dan Regional. Jurnal Ekonomika Dan Manajemen, 9(1), 39–50.
Yuanita, P., & Keban, Y. T. (2020). Evaluasi Efektivitas Program Kang Pisman di Kelurahan Sukaluyu dan Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rekayasa Hijau: Jurnal Teknologi Ramah Lingkungan, 4(2), 93–108.
Yusuf, M. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan Penelitian Gabungan. Prenadamedia Group.
Fitzpatrick, J. L., Sanders, J. R., & Worthen, B. R. (2011). Program evaluation: Alternative approaches and practical guidelines. Pearson Higher Ed.
Funnell, S. C., & Rogers, P. J. (2011). Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. Jossey-Bass.
OECD. (2010). Quality standards for development evaluation. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Sage Publications.
Stufflebeam, D. L. (2003). The CIPP model for evaluation. In T. Kellaghan & D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
