RECONSTRUCTING THE PHILOSOPHY OF LOVE IN ISLAMIC EDUCATION: HUMANISTIC APPROACHES TO CULTIVATING EMPATHY, TOLERANCE, AND HARMONY

Authors

  • Wiwin Narti Pendidikan Islam Anak Usia Dini, Institut Agama Islam Yasni Bungo Author
  • Latifa Annum Dalimunthe UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan Author
  • Al Amin Department of Islamic Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business, Universitas Airlangga, Surabaya, Indonesia. Department of Economics and Business, Universitas Islam Negeri Bukittinggi, Bukittinggi, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Islamic Education, Philosophy of Love, Humanistic Pedagogy, Empathy, Tolerance, Harmony, Moral Education, Rahmah, Ta’dib, Islamic Humanism

Abstract

This study aims to reconstruct the philosophy of love in Islamic education through a humanistic approach that integrates spirituality, empathy, and social harmony. Using a critical literature review and philosophical-hermeneutic analysis, the research explores classical Islamic thought, particularly the concepts of maḥabbah (love), ta’dib (ethical discipline), and rahmah (compassion), in relation to modern humanistic theories advanced by Carl Rogers and Abraham Maslow. The findings reveal that love in Islam functions not merely as an emotional state but as an epistemological and ethical foundation that unites divine knowledge with human experience. This reconstruction leads to the formulation of a Love-Based Islamic Humanistic Education (LIHE) model comprising three interrelated dimensions: spiritual foundation (cognitive-affective integration), pedagogical process (dialogical and empathic learning), and social manifestation (tolerance and harmony). The synthesis of Islamic and humanistic paradigms offers a transformative moral and character education framework, emphasizing empathy, inclusiveness, and ethical awareness. His study concludes that love should serve as the core of Islamic educational philosophy, bridging faith and humanity while addressing the challenges of pluralism, dehumanization, and moral disintegration in contemporary society. This research contributes theoretically by redefining the epistemology of Islamic education and practically by offering pedagogical guidelines for developing compassionate and inclusive Islamic learning environments.

References

Ahmad, M., & Awang, A. (2023). Humanizing Islamic education: Integrating spirituality, compassion, and global citizenship. Journal of Moral Education, 52(3), 311–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240.2022.2134567

Al-Khateeb, H., & Hashim, R. (2021). Integrating Islamic and humanistic perspectives in moral education: A conceptual analysis. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 19(1), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.24035/ijit.19.2021.203

Halstead, J. M. (2007). Islamic values: A distinctive framework for moral education? Journal of Moral Education, 36(3), 283–296. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057240701643056

Halstead, J. M. (2018). The aims of Islamic education. British Journal of Religious Education, 40(3), 268–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2018.1484696

Ismail, Z., & Osman, S. (2020). Revisiting Islamic pedagogy: Humanism, dialogue, and moral transformation. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 25(2), 101–126.

Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.

Nasr, S. H. (2002). The heart of Islam: Enduring values for humanity. New York: HarperCollins.

Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.

Al-Attas, S. M. N. (1991). The concept of education in Islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.

Chittick, W. C. (1998). The self-disclosure of God: Principles of Ibn al-ʿArabi’s cosmology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

Firdaus, A. (2025). Empathy and love-based Islamic pedagogy in multicultural education. Al-Shajarah: Journal of the International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization, 30(1), 77–98.

Hashim, R., & Rossidy, I. (2000). Islamic religious curriculum in Muslim countries: The humanistic dimension. Journal of Beliefs & Values, 21(1), 19–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/13617670050002362

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2019). Reflecting on reflexive thematic analysis. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health, 11(4), 589–597. https://doi.org/10.1080/2159676X.2019.1628806

Gadamer, H.-G. (2004). Truth and method (2nd ed.). London: Continuum.

Ismail, Z., & Osman, S. (2020). Revisiting Islamic pedagogy: Humanism, dialogue, and moral transformation. Al-Shajarah, 25(2), 101–126.

Maslow, A. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being (2nd ed.). New York: Van Nostrand.

Rogers, C. R. (1983). Freedom to learn for the 80s. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Torraco, R. J. (2016). Writing integrative literature reviews: Using the past and present to explore the future. Human Resource Development Review, 15(4), 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484316671606

Downloads

Published

2025-11-15