HISTORICAL TRANSFORMATION OF CITIZENSHIP THOUGHT: CLASSICAL, MODERN, CONTEMPORARY

Authors

  • Bambang Yuniarto UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon Author
  • Fajar Nurul Ikhlas UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia Author
  • Mutiara Sapira Putri UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon Author
  • Ihsan Ali Multazam UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon, Indonesia Author
  • Deris Ardian UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon Author
  • Muhammad Indera Wiguna UIN Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon Author

Keywords:

Citizenship, Multiculturalism, Political Participation, Individual Rights

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the historical transformation of citizenship thought from the classical, modern, to contemporary eras, and to understand the dynamics of changes in the concept of citizenship alongside social, political, and intellectual developments. The objective of this study is to identify the philosophical and structural turning points that have shaped the understanding of citizenship. The main problem of this research lies in the lack of comprehensive studies that integrally discuss the evolution of citizenship across periods, thus necessitating a study capable of systematically explaining the continuities and shifts in ideas. The limitations of previous studies often separate historical periods, failing to capture the evolutionary narrative. The method used is a qualitative descriptive-historical approach with a literature study that examines the works of classical, modern, and contemporary thinkers, analyzed through content analysis and comparative analysis techniques to identify patterns of thought change. The results show that the classical era emphasized virtue, morality, and active participation in public life, while the modern era shifted the focus to individual rights, the social contract, and the legal status of citizens. In the contemporary era, the concept of citizenship has evolved to become more inclusive, global, and multicultural, and is significantly influenced by digitalization and transnational mobility. Overall, this research confirms that changes in citizenship thought reflect the dynamic relationship between the individual, the state, and the global community, and have important implications for developing adaptive, critical citizenship education that is relevant to global challenges.

References

Airah, Z. (2019). KONTRAK SOSIAL DALAM PANDANGAN ROUSSEAU. Paradigma: Jurnal Kalam Dan Filsafat, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/paradigma.v1i01.27289

Aulia, C., Susanti, E., Fiona, E., Nasywa, F., & Ramadhan, I. (2024). Pengaruh Globalisasi Terhadap Konsep Kewarganegaraan di Era Digital. De Cive : Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.56393/decive.v4i7.2189

Balot, R. (2017). Revisiting Classical Citizenship Ideals: A Study on Law & Society. Studocu.

Cohen, M. (2010). T.H. Marshall’s “Citizenship and Social Class.” Dissent Magazine.

Daly, E. (2018). Citizenship, sovereignty and antipolitics in Rousseau. ISECS.

Daniel P, R. (2014). “Comparative Historical Analysis.” Methodological Practices in Social Movement Research. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198719571.003.0005

Dumaeri, A., & Samsuri, S. (2024). Bryan Stanley Turner’s Philosophical Thoughts: Citizenship Outline Analysis. Journal of Social Research, 3(12). https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v3i12.2305

Fethullah, G. (n.d.). Education from cradle to grave—Fethullah Gülen’s Official Web Site. Retrieved May 28, 2019, from https://fgulen.com/en/fethullah-gulens-works/toward-a-global-civilization-of-love-and-tolerance/education/25271-education-from-cradle-to-grave

Fifi, N. (2015). Model Pendidikan Karakter di Pesantren (Studi Pondok Pesantren Al-Munawwir Krapyak dan Muallimin Muallimat Yogyakarta [Doctoral, UIN Sunan Kalijaga]. http://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/23812/

Gray, B. (2018). Citizenship as Barrier and Opportunity for Ancient Greek and Modern Refugees. Humanities, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/h7030072

Jannah, S. M., Hermawati, P. K., Sujaryanto, H., & Nuryadi, H. (n.d.). Peran Transformasi Kesadaran Kewargaan di Era Globalisasi Digital dalam Membangun Masyarakat Toleran (Studi Kasus Respons terhadap Isu Rasisme di Media Sosial).

Kymlicka. (n.d.). Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights.

Lickona, T. (2009). Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. Bantam Books.

Lukmanul Hakim, A. (2022). Kewarganegaraan Digital, Penguatan Wawasan Global Warga Negara, Dan Peran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Didalamnya. MAARIF, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.47651/mrf.v17i1.153

Ma`arif, M. A., & Kartiko, A. (2018). Fenomenologi Hukuman di Pesantren: Analisis Tata Tertib Santri Pondok Pesantren Daruttaqwa Gresik. Nadwa, 12(1), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.21580/nw.2018.12.1.1862

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative Research Methodology in Social Sciences and Related Subjects. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, 7(1). https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/85654/

Momen, M. (n.d.). Social Rights of Citizenship.

Mukmin, B. A., & Sihaloho, O. A. (n.d.). Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Transformatif: Menuju Warga Negara Berpikir Politis.

Osinsky, P., & Eloranta. (n.d.). Comparative Historical Analysis: Some Insights from Political Transitions of the First Half of the Twentieth Century.

Paparusso, A., & Wenden, C. W. D. (2025). The shifting of traditional understanding of citizenship due to international migration. 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2025.1568332

Putri, M. F. J. L., Saputra, R., Iswardhana, M. R., & Emilia. (2023). KEWARGANEGARAAN: TEORETIS DAN PRAKSIS. FUTURE SCIENCE.

Ramadhan, R. A., & Kartika, G. D. (2025). Rekonseptualisasi Kewarganegaraan Berbasis Negara-Bangsa terhadap Kondisi Masyarakat Multikultural Melalui Pemikiran William Kymlicka. 8(3).

Sitasari, N. W. (2022). MENGENAL ANALISA KONTEN DAN ANALISA TEMATIK DALAM PENELITIAN KUALITATIF. Forum Ilmiah, 19(1).

Suriaman, Bribin, M. L., & Mulyani, H. (2024). Teori dan Implikasi Sosiologi Kewarganegaraan: Klasik hingga Kontemporer. Eureka Media Aksara.

Usmi, R. (2023). Analisis Kewarganegaraan Global dalam Konteks Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan. Journal of Civics and Moral Studies, 8(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.26740/jcms.v8n1.p1-9

Widiatmaka, P., Nuryadi, M. H., & Sugiyanto, A. (2025). Pendidikan kewarganegaraan sebagai sarana pembelajaran dalam menumbuhkan karakter bangsa pada mahasiswa di era digital. Humanika: Kajian Ilmiah Mata Kuliah Umum, 25(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v25i1.80367

Wijaya, D. (2016). KONTRAK SOSIAL MENURUT THOMAS HOBBES DAN JOHN LOCKE. Jurnal Hasil Riset. https://www.e-jurnal.com/2017/02/kontrak-sosial-menurut-thomas-hobbes.html?

Winarno, W. (2015). PEMIKIRAN ARISTOTELES TENTANG KEWARGANEGARAAN DAN KONSTITUSI. HUMANIKA, 21(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.14710/humanika.21.1.56-62

Zandro, A. (2024). Negara Leviathan dan Kontrak Sosial Hobbes: Membentuk Hidup Bersama dalam Pluralitas Masyarakat. AGRAPANA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 1(3). https://e-journal.fisipol-undar.ac.id/index.php/agrapana/article/view/62

Downloads

Published

2025-12-19