COMMUNICATING WITH EMPATHY: ETHICAL PRACTICES IN SOCIAL MEDIA

Authors

  • Bernadus Wibowo Suliantoro Fakultas Bisnis dan Ekonomika universitas atma jaya yogyakarta Author
  • Abdul Wahab Syakhrani STAI Rasyidiyah Khalidiyah Amuntai, Kal-Sel, Indonesia Author

Keywords:

Communicating, Empathy, Ethical Practices, Social Media

Abstract

This research explores the importance of communicating with empathy as an ethical practice on social media. In an increasingly globalised digital era, interactions on social media are often marked by conflict, misunderstanding and unethical behaviour. Through an empathic approach, users can better understand and appreciate others' perspectives and feelings, which in turn reduces potential tensions and enriches the quality of interactions. Empathic communication supports honesty, transparency and inclusiveness, and promotes a more welcoming and safe digital environment. This research shows that empathy not only improves interpersonal relationships but also contributes to the formation of a more solid and harmonious online community. Thus, implementing empathic communication on social media is a key step in achieving better digital ethics and creating more humanised and meaningful interactions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anderson, J. (2021). Empathy as a Pillar of Ethical Social Media Strategies. Digital Strategy Journal, 9(3), 214–228.

Brown, S. (2020). Empathy in Digital Communication: Managing Ethical Dilemmas. Taylor & Francis.

Chen, G. M. (2013). Don't call me that: A techno-feminist critique of the term mommy blogger. Mass Communication and Society,16 (4), 510-532. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2013.782847

Derks, D., Fischer, A. H., & Bos, A. E. R. (2008). The role of emotion in computer- mediated communication: A review. Computers in Human Behaviour,24 (3), 766- 785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.04.004

Goleman, D. (2006). Social Intelligence: The New Science of Human Relationships. Bantam Books.

Greitemeyer, T., & Mügge, D. O. (2014). Effects of Prosocial Video Games on Prosocial Behaviour: A Meta-Analytic Review. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,40 (5), 578-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213520459

Gupta, R. (2018). Ethical Communication: Empathy in the Age of Social Media. Oxford University Press.

Johnson, P. (2022). Navigating Ethical Communication with Empathy in Social Networks.

Cyber Psychology & Behaviour,15 (5), 388-401. https://doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2022.234566

Madekhan, M. (2019). THE POSITION AND FUNCTION OF THEORY IN QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. REFORMA JOURNAL,7 (2), 62-62.

https://doi.org/10.30736/rfma.v7i2.78

Manago, A. M., Graham, M. B., Greenfield, P. M., & Salimkhan, G. (2008). Self- presentation and gender on MySpace. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology,29 (6), 446-458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.07.001

Martinez, C. (2020). Encouraging Empathy: Ethical Guidelines for Social Media Use.

Social Media Studies,8 (2), 67-80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-2020.078645

Morreale, S. P., Spitzberg, B. H., & Barge, J. K. (2006). Human Communication: Motivation, Knowledge, and Skills. Cengage Learning.

Nathanson, A. I. (2003). The role of empathy in media enjoyment: A theoretical framework. Journal of Media Psychology,8 (4), 45-56.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03187264

Neubaum, G., & Krämer, N. C. (2014). My friends right next to me: A laboratory investigation on predictors and consequences of experiencing social closeness on social networking sites. Cyberpsychology, Behaviour, and Social Networking,17 (8), 512-517. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2013.0758

Nguyen, L. (2021). Empathetic Engagements: Practicing Ethics in Online Communities.

Journal of Media Ethics,20 (3), 102-115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0987654.2021.1098765

Pratt, M. W., Wilkinson, M., Pancer, S. M., Alisat, S., Birnie-Lefcovitch, S., Polivy, J., & Adams, G. R. (2015). Quality of contact with gay men and lesbians and attitudes toward them: The role of maturity and religious fundamentalism. Journal of Youth and Adolescence,45 (4), 959-972. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-015-0367- x

Rofiah, C., & Bungin, B. (2021). Qualitative methods: Simple research with triangulation theory design. Develop, 5(1), 18–28.

Sheldon, P. (2016). Emotional regulation of social media use: A mediation model of mindfulness, emotion regulation, and social anxiety. Communication Monographs,83 (1), 57-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637751.2015.1073851

Shensa, A., Sidani, J. E., Dew, M. A., Escobar-Viera, C. G., & Primack, B. A. (2018). Social Media Use and Depression and Anxiety Symptoms: A Cluster Analysis. American Journal of Health Behaviour,42 (2), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.5993/AJHB.42.2.11

Smith, E. (2019). The Role of Empathy in Ethical Social Media Communication. Journal of Digital Ethics,11 (4), 256-269. https://doi.org/10.1080/0987654.2019.3235998

Syawie, M. (2005). THE PROBLEM OF QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE METHODS.

Sosio Informa,10 (2). https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v10i2.1086

Toma, C. L., & Hancock, J. T. (2012). What Lies Beneath: The Linguistic Traces of Deception in Online Dating Profiles. Journal of Communication,62 (1), 78-97. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01619.x

Turkle, S. (2015). Reclaiming Conversation: The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. Penguin Press.

Wang, Z., & Tchernev, J. M. (2012). The 'Myth' of Media Multitasking: Reciprocal Dynamics of Media Multitasking, Personal Needs, and Gratifications. Journal of Communication,62 (3), 493-513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01641.x

Zhang, M. (2019). Ethical Implications of Empathic Communication in Social Media Marketing. Journal of Business Ethics,16 (4), 525-535.

https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025673457890

Downloads

Published

01-05-2025

Issue

Section

Articles