TECHNOLOGY-ENHANCED ISLAMIC RELIGIOUS EDUCATION: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF DIGITAL MEDIA, BLENDED LEARNING, AND TEACHER READINESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.22769488Keywords:
blended learning, digital media, Islamic Religious Education, systematic literature review, teacher readiness, technology-enhanced learningAbstract
Digital transformation has created new opportunities and challenges for Islamic Religious Education, particularly regarding the integration of digital media, blended learning, and teacher readiness. This study systematically reviews the literature to examine the forms, benefits, barriers, and pedagogical implications of technology use in Islamic Religious Education. The study employed a qualitative systematic literature review following the PRISMA stages: identification, screening, eligibility assessment, and article inclusion. Relevant literature was retrieved from the Scopus database using keywords related to Islamic education, digital media, educational technology, blended learning, digital competence, and teacher readiness. The findings indicate that videos, social media, learning management systems, digital Qur’an applications, interactive quizzes, and online communication platforms can expand access to learning, improve flexibility, and increase student engagement. Blended learning also enables online activities to be combined with face-to-face instruction required for religious dialogue, worship practices, moral habituation, and value internalization. Nevertheless, successful implementation is constrained by unequal infrastructure, limited internet access, inadequate professional development, insufficient institutional support, and difficulties in verifying the credibility of online religious information. Teacher readiness emerges as a central mechanism connecting technological availability with meaningful learning outcomes. Such readiness encompasses technical, pedagogical, informational, ethical, and religious competencies. This review proposes an integrated framework connecting technology quality, blended pedagogical design, teacher digital readiness, institutional support, and alignment with Islamic educational values. The study concludes that technology should complement, rather than replace, teachers’ exemplary and spiritual roles. Its findings provide a foundation for developing teacher training, institutional policies, ethical guidelines, and context-sensitive digital learning strategies that strengthen students’ knowledge, spirituality, morality, digital literacy, and social responsibility.
References
Ashraf, M. A., Yang, M., Zhang, Y., Denden, M., Tlili, A., Liu, J., Huang, R., & Burgos, D. (2021). A systematic review of systematic reviews on blended learning: Trends, gaps and future directions. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 14, 1525–1541. https://doi.org/10.2147/PRBM.S331741
Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, V., Matarranz, M., Casado-Aranda, L. A., & Otto, A. (2022). Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19, Article 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8
Bond, M., Bedenlier, S., Marín, V. I., & Händel, M. (2021). Emergency remote teaching in higher education: Mapping the first global online semester. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18, Article 50. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00282-x
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Fernández-Batanero, J. M., Montenegro-Rueda, M., Fernández-Cerero, J., & García-Martínez, I. (2022). Digital competences for teacher professional development: Systematic review. European Journal of Teacher Education, 45(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1827389
Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during COVID-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, Article n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Topping, K. J., Douglas, W., Robertson, D., & Ferguson, N. (2022). Effectiveness of online and blended learning from schools: A systematic review. Review of Education, 10(2), Article e3353. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3353
Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 189–199.
Zhao, Y., Pinto Llorente, A. M., & Sánchez Gómez, M. C. (2021). Digital competence in higher education research: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 168, Article 104212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104212


